Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;KBBPLL, post: 26277247, member: 104064&quot;]There is a sort of similar thread over on NGC, somebody posting a 1985 &quot;dot&quot; experimental cent, convinced that it&#039;s valuable because of the dot, and I&#039;m not sure where experimental came from. He posts an AI response that says the 1985 experimental dot cent is worth thousands, and AI cites &quot;CoinWeek reporting.&quot; I go looking for this CoinWeek article about a 1985 experimental dot cent. The only article that I could find is &quot;1985 Lincoln Cent : A Collector’s Guide&quot;, and the only reference to a dot and experimental is in a comment on the article! Presumably from the same person posting on NGC (&quot;gene&quot; versus &quot;geno&quot;). So apparently this guy thinks he has something valuable, comments to ask about it on a CoinWeek article that&#039;s about 1985 cents in general, then asks AI about it, and AI authoritatively tells him what he wants to hear based on his own post about it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in