Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is a used proof coin with scratches better than a perfect condition uncirculated coin?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="-jeffB, post: 2626698, member: 27832"]I rarely engage in conversations <i>other than</i> to learn things, so I guess it's mutual. I took that year of graduate-level logical theory for the same reason, although it was kind of a different experience. (Meditating on the difference between "possibly necessarily true" and "necessarily possibly true"...)</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Do you understand, then, how your question is meaningless?</p><p><br /></p><p>You asked about the truth of this statement (and another using the same terms):</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>You didn't define "low grade".</p><p><br /></p><p>You didn't define "high end".</p><p><br /></p><p>You didn't define "cases", although I guess we can infer "coins that were minted in both proof and business strikes".</p><p><br /></p><p>So, here's just one question-busting example. Very few silver dollars were minted in 1895 in Philadelphia. 880 proofs were made; they're quite valuable, even if impaired. Mint records indicate that 12000 business-strike coins were made; <i>none</i> of these "uncirculated" coins are known today, although there are tales from dealers who claim to have seen them. If a business-strike 1895-P dollar came onto the market today, and was verified as genuine, it would most likely sell for many times the value of a proof example -- even if it <i>wasn't</i> in "high end" condition, however you define that.</p><p><br /></p><p>1896-P? An MS65 example lists for under $200. A PR-60 lists for over $1600.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="-jeffB, post: 2626698, member: 27832"]I rarely engage in conversations [I]other than[/I] to learn things, so I guess it's mutual. I took that year of graduate-level logical theory for the same reason, although it was kind of a different experience. (Meditating on the difference between "possibly necessarily true" and "necessarily possibly true"...) Do you understand, then, how your question is meaningless? You asked about the truth of this statement (and another using the same terms): You didn't define "low grade". You didn't define "high end". You didn't define "cases", although I guess we can infer "coins that were minted in both proof and business strikes". So, here's just one question-busting example. Very few silver dollars were minted in 1895 in Philadelphia. 880 proofs were made; they're quite valuable, even if impaired. Mint records indicate that 12000 business-strike coins were made; [I]none[/I] of these "uncirculated" coins are known today, although there are tales from dealers who claim to have seen them. If a business-strike 1895-P dollar came onto the market today, and was verified as genuine, it would most likely sell for many times the value of a proof example -- even if it [I]wasn't[/I] in "high end" condition, however you define that. 1896-P? An MS65 example lists for under $200. A PR-60 lists for over $1600.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is a used proof coin with scratches better than a perfect condition uncirculated coin?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...