Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Is a die clashed coin an error coin?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bill in Burl, post: 1356554, member: 23692"]For me, and pre-WWII Canadian coins, a variety is a coin struck with proper dies, good planchets, on good machinery (in proper working order) and the dies were approved by the mintmaster/supervisor as OK to use. Clashed dies happened by accident, due to the machinery/line not operating properly (no planchet fed) and many were then polished out or die wear made them disappear, so they were not "good" dies. Likewise, die chips, cracks, breaks, cuds, strike-throughs, etc are examples of things not in good working order and repairs would be made or they would use the die until failure and then discard. I consider those, and a myriad of other "mistakes" as errors and modern QA would have removed them before issued. Now re-engravings, re-entered, repunches, date/digit spacings, Obverses, reverses, legend fonts, etc are all things to be run as per the mintmaster direction/approval, so I consider them varieties. That's my rule of thumb for me personally, but it's not necessarily by the book .. it just keeps things relatively straight between the ears for me. Many will disagree with my terminology but, if it was good enough for the Canadian Variety pioneers from 50-60 years ago, it's good enough for me. I agree that "die state" is the correct term, but it's still an error to me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bill in Burl, post: 1356554, member: 23692"]For me, and pre-WWII Canadian coins, a variety is a coin struck with proper dies, good planchets, on good machinery (in proper working order) and the dies were approved by the mintmaster/supervisor as OK to use. Clashed dies happened by accident, due to the machinery/line not operating properly (no planchet fed) and many were then polished out or die wear made them disappear, so they were not "good" dies. Likewise, die chips, cracks, breaks, cuds, strike-throughs, etc are examples of things not in good working order and repairs would be made or they would use the die until failure and then discard. I consider those, and a myriad of other "mistakes" as errors and modern QA would have removed them before issued. Now re-engravings, re-entered, repunches, date/digit spacings, Obverses, reverses, legend fonts, etc are all things to be run as per the mintmaster direction/approval, so I consider them varieties. That's my rule of thumb for me personally, but it's not necessarily by the book .. it just keeps things relatively straight between the ears for me. Many will disagree with my terminology but, if it was good enough for the Canadian Variety pioneers from 50-60 years ago, it's good enough for me. I agree that "die state" is the correct term, but it's still an error to me.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Is a die clashed coin an error coin?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...