Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
"Irregular" Eastern mint Septimius Severus
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2629859, member: 19463"]Some coins get no respect. The previous owner of these four listed them as "Irregular denarii" from an "Irregular" mint. I agree with one. Some people can not accept a coin with 'alternative' spellings or reverse selections as 'official' but we are not dealing with the Rome mint here. Theys are from the Syrian mints usually called Emesa and Laodicea but I would not be surprised to see those names modified before too long if anyone ever publishes an update to RIC IV or BMCRE V.</p><p><br /></p><p>First is the one that really is 'Irregular'. The spelling is not bad but the style is simply wrong. There are several styles from 'Emesa' but this is not one. The coin is as good silver as the regular coins but just a bit on the wild side. The obverse legend shows CEV in place of SEV which is not unknown from Emesa and understandable from a mint full of Greek speakers. They got two of the S's right but the third caused a slip up.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]578530[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Second is a normal Emesa style denarius but the reverse is VENER VICT. The Rome mint never would issue a girly reverse for an Emperor but Emesa did not hold to separation of the sexes on coin types. There are many coins of Julia Domna with boy reverses. This is equal time. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]578531[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The other two are Laodicea variations with Fortuna Reduci. Martin has shown several of these as I recall and I have two other versions with the same spelling swapping the E and D making REDVC RDEVC. The first shows Fortuna standing holding two cornucopiae and has the IMPI---I split on the obverse.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]578532[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The second shows the same RDEVC but with Fortuna as Pietas sacrificing and a more normal IMPII.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]578533[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>For the record, these are my old coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>First is Fortuna as Hilaritas with long palm.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]578537[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>...and two Fortuna seated with different obverse arrangements. his is not a full set of these spelling 'errors'. Isn' it odd the same mistake keeps recurring?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]578534[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]578535[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2629859, member: 19463"]Some coins get no respect. The previous owner of these four listed them as "Irregular denarii" from an "Irregular" mint. I agree with one. Some people can not accept a coin with 'alternative' spellings or reverse selections as 'official' but we are not dealing with the Rome mint here. Theys are from the Syrian mints usually called Emesa and Laodicea but I would not be surprised to see those names modified before too long if anyone ever publishes an update to RIC IV or BMCRE V. First is the one that really is 'Irregular'. The spelling is not bad but the style is simply wrong. There are several styles from 'Emesa' but this is not one. The coin is as good silver as the regular coins but just a bit on the wild side. The obverse legend shows CEV in place of SEV which is not unknown from Emesa and understandable from a mint full of Greek speakers. They got two of the S's right but the third caused a slip up. [ATTACH=full]578530[/ATTACH] Second is a normal Emesa style denarius but the reverse is VENER VICT. The Rome mint never would issue a girly reverse for an Emperor but Emesa did not hold to separation of the sexes on coin types. There are many coins of Julia Domna with boy reverses. This is equal time. [ATTACH=full]578531[/ATTACH] The other two are Laodicea variations with Fortuna Reduci. Martin has shown several of these as I recall and I have two other versions with the same spelling swapping the E and D making REDVC RDEVC. The first shows Fortuna standing holding two cornucopiae and has the IMPI---I split on the obverse. [ATTACH=full]578532[/ATTACH] The second shows the same RDEVC but with Fortuna as Pietas sacrificing and a more normal IMPII. [ATTACH=full]578533[/ATTACH] For the record, these are my old coins. First is Fortuna as Hilaritas with long palm. [ATTACH=full]578537[/ATTACH] ...and two Fortuna seated with different obverse arrangements. his is not a full set of these spelling 'errors'. Isn' it odd the same mistake keeps recurring? [ATTACH=full]578534[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]578535[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
"Irregular" Eastern mint Septimius Severus
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...