Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Justin Lee, post: 4227592, member: 87404&quot;]Here&#039;s mine that is just that much slightly bigger to make it near-ish the range you mention for the tetartemorion.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://iomegacollectionhome.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/incollage_20200207_115942201.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><b>Phokaia, Ionia, Circa 500-460 BC</b></p><p><b>AR Tetartemorion</b></p><p><b>Obverse</b>: Head of griffin right.</p><p><b>Reverse</b>: Quadripartite incuse square.</p><p><b>References</b>: SNG Copenhagen Supp. 339, SNG von Aulock 7938</p><p><b>Size</b>: 7mm, 0.33g</p><p><b><i>Notes</i></b><i>: Appears to be a double die match with <a href="https://www.sixbid.com/en/roma-numismatics-ltd/1433/greek/1303291/ionia-phokaia-ar-tetartemorion-late" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.sixbid.com/en/roma-numismatics-ltd/1433/greek/1303291/ionia-phokaia-ar-tetartemorion-late" rel="nofollow">Roma E-Sale 10 (7/26/2014), Lot # 336</a> </i></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I find that incuse quad interesting with the bit that is not incuse (on mine mostly bottom-right), and that it&#039;s on others of the similar type, like the OP, whereas it doesn&#039;t seem accidental??[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in