Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Interpreting bad coin pictures
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="ToughCOINS, post: 4661626, member: 20480"]Lighting is from 12:00. There is substantial pull away toning, implying excellent originality, and little evidence of wear, although I think I see cabinet friction on numerals and letters.</p><p><br /></p><p>The rim, while having nothing to do with the photos, is largely undisturbed on both sides, indicating the coin was not seriously mishandled.</p><p><br /></p><p>The only thing that would give me pause is the poor focus, potentially hiding serious contact marks or slide marks. This is always a source of concern.</p><p><br /></p><p>Where lack of focus fails to disclose some details, their presence still may be detected from shadows. This goes for both design details and for contact marks.</p><p><br /></p><p>Be careful to take into account the location of perceived marks, as some may correspond well with die clash marks, and that possibility should be built into your assessment.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think I'd probably like this coin at low MS money, but the proof is in the pudding. </p><p><br /></p><p>As I like to say about buying raw coins on eBay . . . we're swimming with the sharks.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="ToughCOINS, post: 4661626, member: 20480"]Lighting is from 12:00. There is substantial pull away toning, implying excellent originality, and little evidence of wear, although I think I see cabinet friction on numerals and letters. The rim, while having nothing to do with the photos, is largely undisturbed on both sides, indicating the coin was not seriously mishandled. The only thing that would give me pause is the poor focus, potentially hiding serious contact marks or slide marks. This is always a source of concern. Where lack of focus fails to disclose some details, their presence still may be detected from shadows. This goes for both design details and for contact marks. Be careful to take into account the location of perceived marks, as some may correspond well with die clash marks, and that possibility should be built into your assessment. I think I'd probably like this coin at low MS money, but the proof is in the pudding. As I like to say about buying raw coins on eBay . . . we're swimming with the sharks.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Interpreting bad coin pictures
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...