Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Interesting article on the human failings of prominent numismatists.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 4544363, member: 24314"]NewStyleKing, posted: "Please put my bachelor's, masters and PhD in the post!"</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie103" alt=":yack:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie103" alt=":yack:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie103" alt=":yack:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie103" alt=":yack:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie103" alt=":yack:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>I can tell you are a very learned person BECAUSE...<b><u><font size="6"><span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">YOU DIDN"T ANSWER MY QUESTION!!!</span></font></u></b></p><p><br /></p><p>I'll ask again:</p><p><br /></p><p>While not EXACT and still evolving, what would you call the study of each (Psychology, Sociology) of them? AFAIK, much of "science" is not exact and still evolving. My dictionary defines science as the study of the physical world. Aren't people part of the physical world?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>NewStyleKing, posted: "Who would not say that tall thinner young people with good accents are more likely to be offered a job over small, lumpy, working-class,balding oldies like me. We all know the truth of various matters we don't need to pretend that framing a theory is clever stuff! [<i><span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 179)">I Agree, however; I'm sure there are lots of exceptions that we all could come up with so perhaps the subject is worth study and given a place in the Science Dept. of a university</span></i>.] Generally Sheldon was right but so were 1000's of others but couldn't be bothered to write the GENERAL bleedin' obvious. [<span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 179)">NUTS! The "thousands" you mention did not have the knowledge in addition to time. We could probably count the Large cent specialists on less than ten fingers way back then. For example, numismatists are STILL WAITING for a reference on U.S. Trade dollars. The knowledge to write one is lacking"] <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">The famous Sexologists were only trying to sort themselves out and to prey on the vulnerable under the guise of "research"-criminal conmen always instinctively know Psychology, Sociology without going to formal school and writing rubbish and the bleedin' obvious.</span> [Probably 90% true, most humans run at least one con sometime in their lives!] <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 4544363, member: 24314"]NewStyleKing, posted: "Please put my bachelor's, masters and PhD in the post!" :rolleyes::yack::yack::yack::yack::yack: I can tell you are a very learned person BECAUSE...[B][U][SIZE=6][COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]YOU DIDN"T ANSWER MY QUESTION!!![/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/B] I'll ask again: While not EXACT and still evolving, what would you call the study of each (Psychology, Sociology) of them? AFAIK, much of "science" is not exact and still evolving. My dictionary defines science as the study of the physical world. Aren't people part of the physical world? NewStyleKing, posted: "Who would not say that tall thinner young people with good accents are more likely to be offered a job over small, lumpy, working-class,balding oldies like me. We all know the truth of various matters we don't need to pretend that framing a theory is clever stuff! [[I][COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 179)]I Agree, however; I'm sure there are lots of exceptions that we all could come up with so perhaps the subject is worth study and given a place in the Science Dept. of a university[/COLOR][/I].] Generally Sheldon was right but so were 1000's of others but couldn't be bothered to write the GENERAL bleedin' obvious. [[COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 179)]NUTS! The "thousands" you mention did not have the knowledge in addition to time. We could probably count the Large cent specialists on less than ten fingers way back then. For example, numismatists are STILL WAITING for a reference on U.S. Trade dollars. The knowledge to write one is lacking"] [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]The famous Sexologists were only trying to sort themselves out and to prey on the vulnerable under the guise of "research"-criminal conmen always instinctively know Psychology, Sociology without going to formal school and writing rubbish and the bleedin' obvious.[/COLOR] [Probably 90% true, most humans run at least one con sometime in their lives!] ;) [/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Interesting article on the human failings of prominent numismatists.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...