Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Pickin and Grinin, post: 8325500, member: 73995&quot;]As far as the Technical grade it got. I would say that the fields are definitely within the PL standards of today. The coin also has a real nice looking cameo to it. I can only go off of how I grade MS65.</p><p>The bag marks in front of the nose and mouth would definitely keep this one below 65 IMO. Even though the marks really aren&#039;t that distracting. Combine that with the frost missing on the eagles breast. I would call this one a MS64PL.</p><p><br /></p><p>The grade on this one doesn&#039;t really matter as much to me. It is staying in the slab as long as I own it. The coin is a good reference to the Technical grading used in the past, and the original MS60, MS65, and MS70 grading scale. I bought the coin/slab for it&#039;s history and will add it to the no line fatty&#039;s, Rattlers, and soap box slab collection I am putting together.</p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s a marvelous coin, and will fit nicely into the collection.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in