Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;masterswimmer, post: 26173437, member: 102022&quot;]Mark, I&#039;m no expert on IHC&#039;s, so take this with a grain of salt until the experts arrive. And they will, because the few representative coins you&#039;ve posted sure look sweet.</p><p><br /></p><p>My take on the &#039;74 and the &#039;77 is this....</p><p><br /></p><p>The &#039;4&#039; in the 1874 looks off. The bottom serif just doesn&#039;t look right. It looks too long. Unless there are varying dies that I&#039;m unfamiliar with that 4 doesn&#039;t appear genuine.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ll say the same for the &#039;7&#039;s&#039; in the 1877. The top serif &#039;bumps&#039; don&#039;t look good.</p><p><br /></p><p>The &#039;08-S looks good to my eye.</p><p><br /></p><p>Again, I AM NO EXPERT. I am looking forward to hearing that I&#039;m wrong though. I&#039;d like to hear you have some beautiful acquisitions.</p><p><br /></p><p>Edit to add: Upon further review the &#039;8&#039; doesn&#039;t look right on the 1874 or the 1877 either. The two holes are wrong.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in