Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 8132471, member: 19463&quot;]These are interesting coins but many of them are just so poorly struck that it is hard to ID them even if you have the book.&nbsp; It is one subject that I believe is better served by drawings compiled from several specimens rather than photos showing real coins with half the detail. I got really interested in them for a short while but moved along when finding different ones got harder.&nbsp; I wrote a hit and run page:</p><p><a href="https://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/bh.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/bh.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/bh.html</a></p><p>I don&#039;t know how many errors are on it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Some rulers/periods made a higher percentage of decently struck coins than did others.&nbsp; I believe there are more decent coins of Khudarayaka than many more common times but that may just be the luck of what I found when I was looking.&nbsp; The hardest thing to find nice might be the minor bronzes (elephant/lion) that accompanied the bull/horseman silver. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1416607[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in