Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Incuse Vs. Relief anomalies
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="non_cents, post: 1706212, member: 30970"]Hi folks. :smile</p><p>Here's another tutorial that will hopefully help people in determining what they have. Today we will be learning about incuse (negative) anomalies vs anomalies in relief (raised). </p><p>Key words:</p><p><br /></p><p>-Incuse: a negative image, an element that is sunken in. Opposite of relief.</p><p>-Relief: An image or design that is raised on the coin. Opposite of incuse.</p><p><br /></p><p>Some errors that you find on a coin will be in relief, and some will be incuse. An example of an error with an incuse anomaly would be a <b>struck through</b> foreign object. This occurs when a foreign piece of material is present in between the planchet and the dies during the striking of the coin. When the dies strike the planchet, the foreign material "clogs" the die and prevents a full strike of the design in a localized area (sometimes can be throughout the whole coin in the case of extreme grease-filled dies). Instead of having a raised part of the design, coins with a struck-through error will show an incuse anomaly. </p><p><br /></p><p>The following is an example of a struck-through foreign object on the reverse of a wheat cent. Notice that it is incuse on the coin and prevented the design from being struck in that area.</p><p><img src="http://i41.tinypic.com/2vuj1qw.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Now here is a coin that is NOT a struck-through error. Rather, it is damage. Although it is incuse on the coin, the sharp edges of the gouge along with the displaced metal means that it DID NOT occur during striking, and was damaged after being minted. On post-1982 cents, if the damage is deep enough, you will be able to see the silver-colored zinc core. Seeing the zinc is another indicator of a cent damaged after strike.</p><p><img src="http://i41.tinypic.com/30wqmih.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The following error is a lamination error, which is caused by impurities in the planchet alloy. The anomaly is incuse. The main difference you can see is that the design elements are still present in the area of the lamination. This is because it is a planchet error and not a striking error.</p><p><img src="http://i42.tinypic.com/fjmbdv.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Now that we have covered incuse anomalies, let's take a look at a couple raised ones. </p><p>First, we will look at die gouges. This is where things may be confusing. Die gouges occur on the die when a tool or other object scrapes part of the face of the die. This creates an <i>incuse</i> anomaly on the die. When a planchet is struck, this area becomes raised. This is because the metal from the planchet is forced into the negative image on the face of the die, meaning that the elements on the coin will be raised. To simplify the statement: if a negative image is present on the die, it will result in a positive image on the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is an example of some odd die gouges present on a coin below Lincoln. They are raised, because they were incuse on the die. Notice that they do not overlap with the design, as die gouges are usually localized on the flat parts of the dies instead of on the incuse elements.</p><p><img src="http://i44.tinypic.com/ek2fxx.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>The last anomaly we will look at is a plating bubble (also known as a plating blister). Note that these are only known to occur on cents composed of a zinc core with a copper plating, as only post-1982 cents (as well as the zinc composition 1982 cents) have a copper plating. These anomalies are caused by contaminants located in the plating, and released gasses within the plating caused by heat during the strike expand the copper plating upward. These "errors" are very common and rarely command a premium. Here is an example of a plating blister on the reverse of a "Zincoln" (zinc-core lincoln memorial cent). Large plating blisters will pop and deflate if poked with a toothpick.</p><p><img src="http://i41.tinypic.com/6nvawy.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>That just about wraps up this tutorial. I hope it helped some people out. Feel free to ask any additional questions.:thumb:</p><p>Keep up the hunt!</p><p>Simon[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="non_cents, post: 1706212, member: 30970"]Hi folks. :smile Here's another tutorial that will hopefully help people in determining what they have. Today we will be learning about incuse (negative) anomalies vs anomalies in relief (raised). Key words: -Incuse: a negative image, an element that is sunken in. Opposite of relief. -Relief: An image or design that is raised on the coin. Opposite of incuse. Some errors that you find on a coin will be in relief, and some will be incuse. An example of an error with an incuse anomaly would be a [B]struck through[/B] foreign object. This occurs when a foreign piece of material is present in between the planchet and the dies during the striking of the coin. When the dies strike the planchet, the foreign material "clogs" the die and prevents a full strike of the design in a localized area (sometimes can be throughout the whole coin in the case of extreme grease-filled dies). Instead of having a raised part of the design, coins with a struck-through error will show an incuse anomaly. The following is an example of a struck-through foreign object on the reverse of a wheat cent. Notice that it is incuse on the coin and prevented the design from being struck in that area. [IMG]http://i41.tinypic.com/2vuj1qw.jpg[/IMG] Now here is a coin that is NOT a struck-through error. Rather, it is damage. Although it is incuse on the coin, the sharp edges of the gouge along with the displaced metal means that it DID NOT occur during striking, and was damaged after being minted. On post-1982 cents, if the damage is deep enough, you will be able to see the silver-colored zinc core. Seeing the zinc is another indicator of a cent damaged after strike. [IMG]http://i41.tinypic.com/30wqmih.jpg[/IMG] The following error is a lamination error, which is caused by impurities in the planchet alloy. The anomaly is incuse. The main difference you can see is that the design elements are still present in the area of the lamination. This is because it is a planchet error and not a striking error. [IMG]http://i42.tinypic.com/fjmbdv.jpg[/IMG] Now that we have covered incuse anomalies, let's take a look at a couple raised ones. First, we will look at die gouges. This is where things may be confusing. Die gouges occur on the die when a tool or other object scrapes part of the face of the die. This creates an [I]incuse[/I] anomaly on the die. When a planchet is struck, this area becomes raised. This is because the metal from the planchet is forced into the negative image on the face of the die, meaning that the elements on the coin will be raised. To simplify the statement: if a negative image is present on the die, it will result in a positive image on the coin. Here is an example of some odd die gouges present on a coin below Lincoln. They are raised, because they were incuse on the die. Notice that they do not overlap with the design, as die gouges are usually localized on the flat parts of the dies instead of on the incuse elements. [IMG]http://i44.tinypic.com/ek2fxx.jpg[/IMG] The last anomaly we will look at is a plating bubble (also known as a plating blister). Note that these are only known to occur on cents composed of a zinc core with a copper plating, as only post-1982 cents (as well as the zinc composition 1982 cents) have a copper plating. These anomalies are caused by contaminants located in the plating, and released gasses within the plating caused by heat during the strike expand the copper plating upward. These "errors" are very common and rarely command a premium. Here is an example of a plating blister on the reverse of a "Zincoln" (zinc-core lincoln memorial cent). Large plating blisters will pop and deflate if poked with a toothpick. [IMG]http://i41.tinypic.com/6nvawy.jpg[/IMG] That just about wraps up this tutorial. I hope it helped some people out. Feel free to ask any additional questions.:thumb: Keep up the hunt! Simon[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Incuse Vs. Relief anomalies
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...