Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;baseball21, post: 4026498, member: 76863&quot;]History is a valid legal argument as it&#039;s called precedent, but that&#039;s never been the basis anyways.&nbsp; It&#039;s a generic term that can mean whatever the reader wants it to.&nbsp; Furthermore anyone who wishes too can avoid using cash altogether to make sure they aren&#039;t offended.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>The USA isn&#039;t allowed to have an official religion that doesn&#039;t mean it cannot ever be mentioned in a generic way.&nbsp; The Supreme Court building itself along with many of the government buildings have references to God in their decorations should we bulldoze all of them?&nbsp; Of course not.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>There&#039;s no reason to start down the hypothetical road to try and shape it how you wish.&nbsp; There&#039;s sound legal basis for why the challenges have failed and will continue to do so[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in