Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Vess1, post: 910586, member: 13650&quot;]Not this argument again!&nbsp;&nbsp; I still don&#039;t agree that 69s are the same.&nbsp; I agree that most of the time, they are the better value.&nbsp; Sometimes you may as well get the 70.&nbsp; &nbsp; But 70s are the &#039;theoretically&#039; perfect coin, to the &#039;naked eye&#039;, that the mint can produce. </p><p>&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; 69&#039;s are basically just about everything else the mint produces with flaws that are easily recognizable to the naked eye.&nbsp; Of course you can put a 70 under a microscope and find a flaw.&nbsp; I don&#039;t think you can look at the grade to this extreme.&nbsp; 70s I&#039;ve seen, do not have obvious flaws, which is uncommon.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp; As discriminating as the grading system is, there&#039;s no way 69s and 70s could ever be lumped together IMO.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in