Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
IMP X SESTERTII OF SEPTIMIUS SEVERUS - PART ONE
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Blake Davis, post: 7949688, member: 91820"][ATTACH=full]1377141[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1377147[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p> As noted in other articles on this site, under Septimius Severus the Rome mint began severely limiting the bronze issues struck at the mint starting ca 197 AD. Among the rarities issues struck 197-198 AD (my dates based on RIC) were those inscribed "IMP X" on the obverse, celebrating Septimius Severus's tenth acclamation by the legions - my knowledge of this procedure is poor, and my brief research before posting this was unsuccessful. The IMP X types have been described by Curtis Clay on this site - briefly: these types are rare, usually found in poor condition, and as such easily overlooked. I have spent three years looking for different examples of IMP X, with the result that I just acquired my fourth one on ebay Spain - a very worn Salus type (RIC 747) which will be posted on receipt. I had examples of the other three when I started searching - three years of diligent searching, one found, which gives an indication of how scarce these are.</p><p><br /></p><p> This photograph (I do not know how to crop it) was sent to me some years ago, and I do not know who owns it. My understanding of RIC is that the image of Salus was only struck for IMP X - why Septimius Severus chose for the most part to ignore a common type in bronze is a mystery.</p><p><br /></p><p> There is another example - Pax - which is also struck under IMP X -One example previously posted on this site is inscribed "PACI AET PMTRP VI COS II" from an old collection and is the most beautiful of these I have yet come across. RIC 745.</p><p><br /></p><p> I understand there is another type of PAX under IMP X, without a reverse inscription. My not very great understanding of OUTLOOK means that I have to post what may be an example of this in a separate thread, which I will do now. As usual work is pressing, making it difficult to find the time to do the write ups these fascinating coins deserve, and the reader is referred to Curtis Clay's comprehensive postings on my other articles dealing with the sestertii of Septimius Severus, including another article on this site devoted to these fascinating coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Blake Davis, post: 7949688, member: 91820"][ATTACH=full]1377141[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1377147[/ATTACH] As noted in other articles on this site, under Septimius Severus the Rome mint began severely limiting the bronze issues struck at the mint starting ca 197 AD. Among the rarities issues struck 197-198 AD (my dates based on RIC) were those inscribed "IMP X" on the obverse, celebrating Septimius Severus's tenth acclamation by the legions - my knowledge of this procedure is poor, and my brief research before posting this was unsuccessful. The IMP X types have been described by Curtis Clay on this site - briefly: these types are rare, usually found in poor condition, and as such easily overlooked. I have spent three years looking for different examples of IMP X, with the result that I just acquired my fourth one on ebay Spain - a very worn Salus type (RIC 747) which will be posted on receipt. I had examples of the other three when I started searching - three years of diligent searching, one found, which gives an indication of how scarce these are. This photograph (I do not know how to crop it) was sent to me some years ago, and I do not know who owns it. My understanding of RIC is that the image of Salus was only struck for IMP X - why Septimius Severus chose for the most part to ignore a common type in bronze is a mystery. There is another example - Pax - which is also struck under IMP X -One example previously posted on this site is inscribed "PACI AET PMTRP VI COS II" from an old collection and is the most beautiful of these I have yet come across. RIC 745. I understand there is another type of PAX under IMP X, without a reverse inscription. My not very great understanding of OUTLOOK means that I have to post what may be an example of this in a separate thread, which I will do now. As usual work is pressing, making it difficult to find the time to do the write ups these fascinating coins deserve, and the reader is referred to Curtis Clay's comprehensive postings on my other articles dealing with the sestertii of Septimius Severus, including another article on this site devoted to these fascinating coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
IMP X SESTERTII OF SEPTIMIUS SEVERUS - PART ONE
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...