Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;funkee, post: 1824213, member: 37925&quot;]Doesn&#039;t look like it.</p><p><br /></p><p>A note with the Speelman/White signature combination (or Elliot/White) is considered a mule because it uses a back plate from the Burke era (Parker/Burke or Teehee/Burke).</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is an image for your comparison.</p><p><br /></p><p>The note on the left is an Fr. 57, with the Teehee/Burke signature combination. Note that the back plate number is in the 9 o&#039;clock position.</p><p><br /></p><p>The note on the right is an Fr. 60, with the Speelman/White signature combination. The back plate number is in the 4 o&#039;clock position.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]299929[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>So therefore a mule is a note with a Speelman/White or Elliot/White signature combination on the face, but uses a Burke back plate, which can be identified by the position of the back plate number at the 9 o&#039;clock position.</p><p><br /></p><p>Although your image is not super clear, it does look like it has the proper White back plate, and would not be a mule.</p><p><br /></p><p>Sorry.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in