Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
I'm excited to have an Actian arch!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="nerosmyfavorite68, post: 8261709, member: 134416"]I had started a recent debate about whether decrepit rarities are better or beautiful common/affordable coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>I was all ready to post about my newest coin, a Constantine IV from Rome which isn't in bad shape, but was ugly one day one, but Marc Breitsprecher's lightning fast shipping fooled me again! It's my Marc B order which arrived first.</p><p><br /></p><p>A note about decrepit coins. Like with all my hobbies, I have zilch desire in resale; they're solely for my own enjoyment, so who cares if a rarity or expensive coin is decrepit? One can always pick up a better example and have two!</p><p><br /></p><p>While a fairly worn coin, I'd grade it about aF/VG, the picture makes it look super porous, which it isn't in person. One doesn't notice any porosity in person; it's a cleaned, worn coin. It looks better in person.</p><p><br /></p><p>I consider myself to have excellent taste in the types of coins I collect, but on a regular person's budget (basically up to $1,000 in optimal circumstances), I don't really have a commensurate budget. So if this type of example pops up for a want, I'm on it!</p><p><br /></p><p>I like my coins large and in charge, but I deeply enjoy Denarii of Sulla to the end.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1457029[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><b>Title: Octavian, as Sole Imperator (31-27 BC). AR Denarius / Actian Arch</b></p><p><b>Attribution:</b> RIC I 267 Uncertain Italian mint</p><p><b>Date:</b> 30-29 BC</p><p><b>Obverse:</b> Anipigraphic, bare head of Octavian right</p><p><b>Reverse:</b> Quadriga, facing, set atop triumphal arch (the Actian Arch) with architrave inscribed with IMP CAESAR</p><p><b>Size:</b> 18.09mm</p><p><b>Weight:</b> 2.63 grams</p><p><b>Description:</b> (my grade: aF/VG).</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm sure fellow CT members have much nicer examples. Post away!</p><p><br /></p><p>I bought a couple of throw-ins.</p><p>I don't really like coins of the late empire, but I always wanted a Valentinian AE1. You probably guessed why; they're fairly large coins. I prefer the mints of the Western empire, but beggars can't be choosers.</p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">That brings up a point; what's the proper search terms to use if I want to search out AE1? There's so many different terms for them, AE1, AE 1, Maiorina, etc.</span></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1457034[/ATTACH] </p><p><b>Title: Valentinian I (AD 364-375) Æ Follis / Emperor</b></p><p><b>Attribution:</b> RIC IX 2 Heraclea</p><p><b>Date:</b> AD 364-367</p><p><b>Obverse:</b> DN VALENTINI-ANVS P F AVG, pearl-diademed, draped and cuirassed bust right</p><p><b>Reverse:</b> RESTITVTOR REIBVBLICAE, emperor standing right holding labarum and Victory; SMHA in exergue</p><p><b>Size:</b> 27.77mm</p><p><b>Weight:</b> 7.95 grams</p><p><b>Description:</b> good Fine+</p><p><br /></p><p>The third; a placeholder. I needed a coin of Tiberius Apsimar, and I didn't think it would last long when it popped up, so I hopped on it!</p><p><br /></p><p>It's a hard coin to photograph, but in hand it looks less atrocious. It's kind of a dull, brown coin. The original collector probably wasn't far off when he said Fine. There's actually more detail in person, believe it or not. </p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, it was a placeholder; a coin to tick the box of Tiberius Apsimar.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1457041[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Attribution:</b> Sear Byzantine 1395 Syracuse mint</p><p><b>Date:</b> AD 698-705</p><p><b>Obverse:</b> Tiberius standing facing, holding globus cruciger and long cross</p><p><b>Reverse:</b> Large M, palm branch to either side, SCL below</p><p><b>Size:</b> 21.75mm</p><p><b>Weight:</b> 3.73 grams</p><p><b>Rarity:</b> <img src="https://www.cointalk.com/file:///J:/PC%20Backup%2011/my%20coins%202022/Marc%20Breitsprecher%20-%20Lot%20Info%20Sear%201395%20Byzantine%20Empire.%20Tiberius%20III%20Apsimar%20(AD%20698-705)%20%C4%86%20Half%20Follis_files/6.gif" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> 6</p><p>my grade: VG, but looks less awful in person.</p><p>Mom's grade (who hasn't seen this coin): slag heap. (she calls all Byzantine coins that). </p><p><br /></p><p>Did Byzantine rulers of this time have the Christopher Columbus/Renaissance era-man hairdo?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="nerosmyfavorite68, post: 8261709, member: 134416"]I had started a recent debate about whether decrepit rarities are better or beautiful common/affordable coins. I was all ready to post about my newest coin, a Constantine IV from Rome which isn't in bad shape, but was ugly one day one, but Marc Breitsprecher's lightning fast shipping fooled me again! It's my Marc B order which arrived first. A note about decrepit coins. Like with all my hobbies, I have zilch desire in resale; they're solely for my own enjoyment, so who cares if a rarity or expensive coin is decrepit? One can always pick up a better example and have two! While a fairly worn coin, I'd grade it about aF/VG, the picture makes it look super porous, which it isn't in person. One doesn't notice any porosity in person; it's a cleaned, worn coin. It looks better in person. I consider myself to have excellent taste in the types of coins I collect, but on a regular person's budget (basically up to $1,000 in optimal circumstances), I don't really have a commensurate budget. So if this type of example pops up for a want, I'm on it! I like my coins large and in charge, but I deeply enjoy Denarii of Sulla to the end. [ATTACH=full]1457029[/ATTACH] [B]Title: Octavian, as Sole Imperator (31-27 BC). AR Denarius / Actian Arch[/B] [B]Attribution:[/B] RIC I 267 Uncertain Italian mint [B]Date:[/B] 30-29 BC [B]Obverse:[/B] Anipigraphic, bare head of Octavian right [B]Reverse:[/B] Quadriga, facing, set atop triumphal arch (the Actian Arch) with architrave inscribed with IMP CAESAR [B]Size:[/B] 18.09mm [B]Weight:[/B] 2.63 grams [B]Description:[/B] (my grade: aF/VG). I'm sure fellow CT members have much nicer examples. Post away! I bought a couple of throw-ins. I don't really like coins of the late empire, but I always wanted a Valentinian AE1. You probably guessed why; they're fairly large coins. I prefer the mints of the Western empire, but beggars can't be choosers. [COLOR=#0000ff]That brings up a point; what's the proper search terms to use if I want to search out AE1? There's so many different terms for them, AE1, AE 1, Maiorina, etc.[/COLOR] [ATTACH=full]1457034[/ATTACH] [B]Title: Valentinian I (AD 364-375) Æ Follis / Emperor[/B] [B]Attribution:[/B] RIC IX 2 Heraclea [B]Date:[/B] AD 364-367 [B]Obverse:[/B] DN VALENTINI-ANVS P F AVG, pearl-diademed, draped and cuirassed bust right [B]Reverse:[/B] RESTITVTOR REIBVBLICAE, emperor standing right holding labarum and Victory; SMHA in exergue [B]Size:[/B] 27.77mm [B]Weight:[/B] 7.95 grams [B]Description:[/B] good Fine+ The third; a placeholder. I needed a coin of Tiberius Apsimar, and I didn't think it would last long when it popped up, so I hopped on it! It's a hard coin to photograph, but in hand it looks less atrocious. It's kind of a dull, brown coin. The original collector probably wasn't far off when he said Fine. There's actually more detail in person, believe it or not. Anyway, it was a placeholder; a coin to tick the box of Tiberius Apsimar. [ATTACH=full]1457041[/ATTACH] [B]Attribution:[/B] Sear Byzantine 1395 Syracuse mint [B]Date:[/B] AD 698-705 [B]Obverse:[/B] Tiberius standing facing, holding globus cruciger and long cross [B]Reverse:[/B] Large M, palm branch to either side, SCL below [B]Size:[/B] 21.75mm [B]Weight:[/B] 3.73 grams [B]Rarity:[/B] [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/file:///J:/PC%20Backup%2011/my%20coins%202022/Marc%20Breitsprecher%20-%20Lot%20Info%20Sear%201395%20Byzantine%20Empire.%20Tiberius%20III%20Apsimar%20(AD%20698-705)%20%C4%86%20Half%20Follis_files/6.gif[/IMG] 6 my grade: VG, but looks less awful in person. Mom's grade (who hasn't seen this coin): slag heap. (she calls all Byzantine coins that). Did Byzantine rulers of this time have the Christopher Columbus/Renaissance era-man hairdo?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
I'm excited to have an Actian arch!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...