Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
I'm back!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2920180, member: 19463"]Mine is an as and shows a bearded Pius with draped head. I liked the coin when I bought it at a show but now regret the purchase. When I did not know I was missing VOTA in exergue, I thought it was full legend but when I got home and looked it up, I discovered my error.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]706923[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The footnote to BMCRE 1812 (your coin) quotes a Variant of reverse with 'Genius Senatus in place of Antoninus (?), Strack no, 1014.' My question is how you tell the two apart. My as looks like Pius to me more than yours does but I have no idea what the coin in the BMCRE note looked like. The coin shown in the BMCRE plate 44,6 looks more youthful than I would call Pius. Each die is different. Such little things are easy to allow run-away imaginations. My as is BMCRE 1817 which is listed as a worn coin with '(VOTA ? in ex.)' so their example (not illustrated in the plates) is missing the VOTA just like mine is. We see things like this in the British Museum Catalogs since they are listings of an actual collection so we can see weights and die axes of their examples. My as is nearly a gram lighter than theirs and has the opposite axis alignment. Whether this information is significant to us is a question.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2920180, member: 19463"]Mine is an as and shows a bearded Pius with draped head. I liked the coin when I bought it at a show but now regret the purchase. When I did not know I was missing VOTA in exergue, I thought it was full legend but when I got home and looked it up, I discovered my error. [ATTACH=full]706923[/ATTACH] The footnote to BMCRE 1812 (your coin) quotes a Variant of reverse with 'Genius Senatus in place of Antoninus (?), Strack no, 1014.' My question is how you tell the two apart. My as looks like Pius to me more than yours does but I have no idea what the coin in the BMCRE note looked like. The coin shown in the BMCRE plate 44,6 looks more youthful than I would call Pius. Each die is different. Such little things are easy to allow run-away imaginations. My as is BMCRE 1817 which is listed as a worn coin with '(VOTA ? in ex.)' so their example (not illustrated in the plates) is missing the VOTA just like mine is. We see things like this in the British Museum Catalogs since they are listings of an actual collection so we can see weights and die axes of their examples. My as is nearly a gram lighter than theirs and has the opposite axis alignment. Whether this information is significant to us is a question.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
I'm back!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...