Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
I'm at a loss and need help with this 1983 LMC
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Kevin Mader, post: 6665610, member: 106826"]The explanation provided by Fred makes sense. Weak strike will not move the material around fully and may be compounded by the zinc, which is harder to flow relative to copper. I don't think grease is out of the question. Typically, the manufacturing materials are introduced at a specific point to keep the tools lubricated and to extend the life of the tool. Too much and things get sticky...problems in production. Also, the cleanliness of the material being coined. Dust becomes more problematic when oil is introduced. I got to wondering a while ago about the orientation of the press (vertical vs horizontal), how substrate material affected the coining process, point where lubricant is added, and if gravity was a factor. I read that when determining weak strikes, consider the definition where the field meets the rim. If the rim is defined, then you might want to consider grease. Greasers tend to have full rims but are missing devices/details as we see here.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, maybe it's all the above. Good discussion no matter, and getting a lookback into the mint in the 80s relative to equipment helps develop a fuller picture for me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Mader, post: 6665610, member: 106826"]The explanation provided by Fred makes sense. Weak strike will not move the material around fully and may be compounded by the zinc, which is harder to flow relative to copper. I don't think grease is out of the question. Typically, the manufacturing materials are introduced at a specific point to keep the tools lubricated and to extend the life of the tool. Too much and things get sticky...problems in production. Also, the cleanliness of the material being coined. Dust becomes more problematic when oil is introduced. I got to wondering a while ago about the orientation of the press (vertical vs horizontal), how substrate material affected the coining process, point where lubricant is added, and if gravity was a factor. I read that when determining weak strikes, consider the definition where the field meets the rim. If the rim is defined, then you might want to consider grease. Greasers tend to have full rims but are missing devices/details as we see here. So, maybe it's all the above. Good discussion no matter, and getting a lookback into the mint in the 80s relative to equipment helps develop a fuller picture for me.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
I'm at a loss and need help with this 1983 LMC
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...