Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
"Illegal" coin deal involving the world's most valuable coin?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Mark Feld, post: 792060, member: 11467"]This was a listed exception to the recall: "<font face="Century">(b) Gold coin and gold certificates in an amount not exceeding in the aggregate $100.00 belonging to any one person; and gold coins having recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins."</font> Thus, the 1933 Saints should have been legal to own, with respect to the recall, at least.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Mark Feld, post: 792060, member: 11467"]This was a listed exception to the recall: "[FONT=Century](b) Gold coin and gold certificates in an amount not exceeding in the aggregate $100.00 belonging to any one person; and gold coins having recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins."[/FONT] Thus, the 1933 Saints should have been legal to own, with respect to the recall, at least.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
"Illegal" coin deal involving the world's most valuable coin?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...