Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Ikes
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="19Lyds, post: 2285346, member: 15929"]If you look at most details graded coins, the label states "Improperly Cleaned".</p><p>PCGS's grading standards states: "<b>Code</b> <b>92</b> Cleaning Harsh cleaning or polishing"</p><p>"<b>Cleaned</b></p><p>Surface damage due to any form of abrasive cleaning. "Cleaned" covers a wide range or appearances, from a grossly polished coin to one where faint hairlines can be seen only at a particular angle or in only one area on an otherwise perfectly normal coin. This is perhaps the most frustrating of all the No Grades, because subtle cleaning is often difficult to detect in less-than-optimal grading conditions. "Dipping" (the removal of toning with a chemical bath) is not considered cleaning under this definition."</p><p><br /></p><p>Therefore, to say that an untarnished 1974-S Proof IKE has been "Cleaned" is technically correct BUT collectibly acceptable. After all, who would want to collect on of these with undesirable haze (from the US Mint) and/or undesirable toning? Not to mention that toning can actually affect the surfaces of the coin furthering the possibilities of damage.</p><p><br /></p><p>Is it a "Fool's" errand to try and sell it? Of course not BUT you might be looking at a long and difficult search since the ONLY way you'd know for sure is by purchasing one in the original US Mint slab.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="19Lyds, post: 2285346, member: 15929"]If you look at most details graded coins, the label states "Improperly Cleaned". PCGS's grading standards states: "[B]Code[/B] [B]92[/B] Cleaning Harsh cleaning or polishing" "[B]Cleaned[/B] Surface damage due to any form of abrasive cleaning. "Cleaned" covers a wide range or appearances, from a grossly polished coin to one where faint hairlines can be seen only at a particular angle or in only one area on an otherwise perfectly normal coin. This is perhaps the most frustrating of all the No Grades, because subtle cleaning is often difficult to detect in less-than-optimal grading conditions. "Dipping" (the removal of toning with a chemical bath) is not considered cleaning under this definition." Therefore, to say that an untarnished 1974-S Proof IKE has been "Cleaned" is technically correct BUT collectibly acceptable. After all, who would want to collect on of these with undesirable haze (from the US Mint) and/or undesirable toning? Not to mention that toning can actually affect the surfaces of the coin furthering the possibilities of damage. Is it a "Fool's" errand to try and sell it? Of course not BUT you might be looking at a long and difficult search since the ONLY way you'd know for sure is by purchasing one in the original US Mint slab.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Ikes
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...