Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;TypeCoin971793, post: 2786592, member: 78244&quot;]You have not answered any of the questions posed to you, yet you keep demanding answers to your question after it has been answered multiple times. Your arguments have not been valid because they are chock-full of erroneous information and logical fallacies. People are attacking your &quot;45 plus years of knowledge&quot; because you show no signs of having acquired it in the first place, and have not offered any proof other than simple boasting.</p><p><br /></p><p>I agree with your comments about QC <b><u><i>insofar</i></u></b> that we are paying PCGS to make the determination that a coin&#039;s toning is original or artificial. However, if the toning is artificial, then a &quot;details&quot; grade is warranted, end of story. </p><p><br /></p><p>There was no attempt by PCGS to slander you like you insist. Yet you don&#039;t think twice about slandering other people because they are simply not telling you what you want to hear. Your coin is damaged. End of story. If your feelings are hurt because of the coin&#039;s grade, then go home and suck your thumb until you feel better.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you feel the grade is in error, try submitting again. I have done it once and was successful.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in