Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;kanga, post: 8417357, member: 9270&quot;]This appears to be the case.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ll have to ask the TPGs about attribution.</p><p>If they ONLY use the &quot;rev of 69&quot; label then you won&#039;t know if unlabeled slabs are automatically &quot;Bold&quot; or the coins have just not been examined for &quot;shallow&quot; vs. &quot;bold&quot;.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ve got a full Red Book set of IHC&#039;s in MS except for the shallow/bold varieties.</p><p>This does not count the error varieties except for the 1894 Doubled Date.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in