Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Ignoring an element of grading
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 437726, member: 15309"]OK, here is the description provided by Heritage:</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Description</b> <b>1924 $1 MS67 NGC.</b> This is an immensely interesting coin, with some of the thickest mint frost we have ever seen on a Peace dollar, clearly a fresh strike from new dies on both sides. It is also, frankly, quite softly struck, possibly the product of die-set-width experimentation before the true production run began. As a coin that is also almost completely devoid of contact marks, it is a stimulating and exceptional piece. Census: 65 in 67, 1 finer (9/08).</p><p><br /></p><p>If they are correct that the coin is the result if a die-set-width experimentation, then wouldn't that mean that either the coin is an error or a specimen piece that is deserving of the lofty MS67 grade. The problem is that they could never prove the coin's actual origin. They only have indicators such as the extremely unusual frosty luster indicating an early die state as well as the fact that the coin bears almost no discernable marks. I would feel much better about the grade if this pre-production die width experiment was attributed in the grade. Without it, I think the coin is overgraded. However, I still think this coin is ultra cool and wouldn't mind owning the most weakly struck MS67 coin in existence from a pedigreed collection. Hopefully, I can win with a low ball bid.</p><p><br /></p><p>What say you![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 437726, member: 15309"]OK, here is the description provided by Heritage: [B]Description[/B] [B]1924 $1 MS67 NGC.[/B] This is an immensely interesting coin, with some of the thickest mint frost we have ever seen on a Peace dollar, clearly a fresh strike from new dies on both sides. It is also, frankly, quite softly struck, possibly the product of die-set-width experimentation before the true production run began. As a coin that is also almost completely devoid of contact marks, it is a stimulating and exceptional piece. Census: 65 in 67, 1 finer (9/08). If they are correct that the coin is the result if a die-set-width experimentation, then wouldn't that mean that either the coin is an error or a specimen piece that is deserving of the lofty MS67 grade. The problem is that they could never prove the coin's actual origin. They only have indicators such as the extremely unusual frosty luster indicating an early die state as well as the fact that the coin bears almost no discernable marks. I would feel much better about the grade if this pre-production die width experiment was attributed in the grade. Without it, I think the coin is overgraded. However, I still think this coin is ultra cool and wouldn't mind owning the most weakly struck MS67 coin in existence from a pedigreed collection. Hopefully, I can win with a low ball bid. What say you![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Ignoring an element of grading
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...