Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
ICG vs PCGS, NGC
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2579845, member: 24314"]<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie20" alt=":banghead:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie20" alt=":banghead:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <span style="color: #0000b3">Guess I was not clear with my English. Sorry.</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000b3"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000b3">Perhaps what I should have written is this: It does not matter which grading service, which holder, or what the label says. In my experience of looking at thousands of slabs a year, a very large number of high grade slabbed (especially 70's) modern coins are not. They are over graded.</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000b3"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000b3">What you say is true. A 69 in a 70 holder is still a 69! Unfortunately it will sell as a 70 in a PCGS or NGC slab. An ICG or ANACS 69 in a 70 slab will not. Agree?</span></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As I wrote before, the standards of the top four TPGS's are very close. Sticking a "qualifier" (FBL) in the equation is just confusing the issue. <span style="color: #0000b3"> Everybody on CT should know that PCGS has loose standards for bell lines.</span> </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #0000b3">That's my point. In a million coins there will be more over graded examples than in 100K. I think in this case, the percentage of errors is small for ALL four services. Therefore, the volume of coins going through is the major factor to consider.</span> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2579845, member: 24314"]:banghead::banghead::rolleyes: [COLOR=#0000b3]Guess I was not clear with my English. Sorry. Perhaps what I should have written is this: It does not matter which grading service, which holder, or what the label says. In my experience of looking at thousands of slabs a year, a very large number of high grade slabbed (especially 70's) modern coins are not. They are over graded. What you say is true. A 69 in a 70 holder is still a 69! Unfortunately it will sell as a 70 in a PCGS or NGC slab. An ICG or ANACS 69 in a 70 slab will not. Agree?[/COLOR] As I wrote before, the standards of the top four TPGS's are very close. Sticking a "qualifier" (FBL) in the equation is just confusing the issue. [COLOR=#0000b3] Everybody on CT should know that PCGS has loose standards for bell lines.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000b3]That's my point. In a million coins there will be more over graded examples than in 100K. I think in this case, the percentage of errors is small for ALL four services. Therefore, the volume of coins going through is the major factor to consider.[/COLOR] ;)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
ICG vs PCGS, NGC
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...