Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;charley, post: 8209559, member: 5372&quot;]We are in COMPLETE agreement. Your methodology of evaluation and concern and past disappointments are exactly the points that Mr. Albanese stressed on&nbsp; the PCGS Board were and are his basis of, and reason for, undertaking the task of making a CAC Market.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;You know and I know you are the definition of Hobbyist/Collector that CAC cared about and wanted to re-establish trust in the Hobby and the fiduciary responsibility. Without those qualities, there is no trustworthy&nbsp; Market for the collector.</p><p><br /></p><p>Technical standards are technical standards. Market standards are market standards. There is absolutely nothing wrong with taking profits off the table. It is better for the Hobby, though,&nbsp; if the profits are based on quality and not a false sense of security.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in