Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
I think we all feel our collections are Unique...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Billy Kingsley, post: 916305, member: 19456"]Excellent thread, About Good! </p><p> </p><p>Each and every collection is inherently different. Every coin, is truly unique. Sure they may be the exact same in statististics...same year, mint mark, same grade, etc. But each coin (and this is especially true with circulated coins) is unique due to the journey it has taken since it was minted. </p><p> </p><p>For example: In circulation, specifically in a bank roll I got back in March, I found a 1912 cent. Surely there are other members of the forum, that have 1912 cents. But there are NO other members who have this <i>specific</i> 1912 cent, and it's a unique one, as it is clearly damaged...it looks to have spent some time under water. But not much, I almost wonder if it was tossed into a fountain. And this is the same for every coin in everyone's collection. Even if they are the same general coins, each coin is unique, and therefore each collection is unique. </p><p> </p><p>Like Donn and Vic, I collect World coins. For me, as long is it was a coin that actually circulated in it's native country at some point, it is a viable coin for my collection. My collection ranges in age from circa 300 BC to 2010, although for 2010 I only have three coins, and they are all from the US. How many members of this forum have the exact same coins I do, down to year/mintmark for each and every one of those countries? The odds are, None! There are just too many variables. There are, I would wager, into the millions in possibilities, or maybe more....I would not be surprised if it was into the billions, seriously, when you take into account ancients especially. I am counting not just types but also each year/mintmark combination for each and every type. The odds that anyone on the forum would have the exact same coins as I do are slim to nil, and likewise the odds of me matching someone else's collection are...you guessed it, slim to nil! There may be some overlapping where we have the same year/mintmark for a particular type, any one of us, but to match it totally...I wouldn't bet on it. </p><p> </p><p>My primary source of world coins is buying bulk lots. (I've actually only done two) When you do that, you don't know what you will get...which is one of the reasons I like it, because it's a surprise no matter what. (any duplicates become my trade stash) In doing those two bulk lots, I've gotten coins ranging in age from 1893-2009. (I did one batch in 2008 and one in 09). Some of the coins, based on condition, I would not purchased as an indivigual coin. For example I got one from Peru that someone had put some scotch type tape on. Who would buy something like that for their collection? Even I wouldn't, and I would wager that my standards are the lowest on CoinTalk. Yet, that coin is now in my collection because it's the best (only!) example I have of that date/mintmark coin. </p><p> </p><p>When I buy an indivigual coin, I look for a few things...Does it have scratches? Normal circulation scratches I don't mind, but I don't like deep scratches. Has it been cleaned? I don't really mind a dip, but I absolutely hate hairlines from wiping. Does it have any rim dings? I don't really like them too but if they are not too distracting...or if they lower a coin I could not otherwise afford down onto my price range...I will except them. Has the coin been bent? I don't really like it but I have a few. I will try to get an upgrade but there are some coins that I would not be able to get if they were not bent. How does the coin look, color wise? I have been pretty clear in the past that I don't care for toning. I do have some examples in my collection that have toned...and they are some of my least favorite coins. I look for examples that retain the same coloration they left the mint with...but in many cases that means uncirculated and then that means I can't afford it. So, barring that, I look for a nice even coloration. For silver and nickel, I like a slate gray coloration, for copper, if I can't have mint red, I want it to look like milk chocolate. It's essentially important to me that the coin be even in color, be it factory fresh or aged like a fine wine or cheese. I don't mind darker fields with lighter devices, as long as it was aquired through wear and not a wipe. One thing that is an absolute deal breaker for me is a hole. Unless it was something like the only one in existance, holes mean no buy for me. (And if it was the only one, even with a hole, I couldn't afford it) I also don't accept whizzing(polishing) and I have none in my collection that I am aware of, I don't guarentee that I am knowledgeable to spot them if I do...I'm still a rookie really with 2 years and one month only into this hobby. I also really dislike verdigris...and having that present on a coin means I want to upgrade it. I have even "Upgraded" to a lower grade coin without verdigris over a higher graded one with it. Lucky for me most of my collection is still of a circulating type! </p><p> </p><p>Do other forum members have the same guidelines for their collection as I do? Maybe, I really don't know. If they do, I would guess their collection does look similar to mine. But then again, my standards are low...like I said above, probably the lowest on CoinTalk. I am sure most collectors have more strict standards than I do...I just want to have an example of that date/mintmark in my collection, and if I can, I am happy. Every thing I say I look for above, I could honestly say I have something in my collection that I say I don't want, except for holed coins (not counting the few world issues that are supposed to have holes, of course) I have multiple toned, bent, wiped, or otherwise damaged coins in my collection...and I love them all the same. </p><p> </p><p>I kind of feel like I am protecting them. I am sure it is silly, but I feel that if I don't save them, who will? Even problem coins have a story to tell, and I feel that my stewardship of them keeps them from being melted, further abused, or otherwise lost to history. And I'm not talking raritys here, just common everyday stuff that most people consider junk, I love. My motto is: Another man's trash is MY treasure![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Billy Kingsley, post: 916305, member: 19456"]Excellent thread, About Good! Each and every collection is inherently different. Every coin, is truly unique. Sure they may be the exact same in statististics...same year, mint mark, same grade, etc. But each coin (and this is especially true with circulated coins) is unique due to the journey it has taken since it was minted. For example: In circulation, specifically in a bank roll I got back in March, I found a 1912 cent. Surely there are other members of the forum, that have 1912 cents. But there are NO other members who have this [I]specific[/I] 1912 cent, and it's a unique one, as it is clearly damaged...it looks to have spent some time under water. But not much, I almost wonder if it was tossed into a fountain. And this is the same for every coin in everyone's collection. Even if they are the same general coins, each coin is unique, and therefore each collection is unique. Like Donn and Vic, I collect World coins. For me, as long is it was a coin that actually circulated in it's native country at some point, it is a viable coin for my collection. My collection ranges in age from circa 300 BC to 2010, although for 2010 I only have three coins, and they are all from the US. How many members of this forum have the exact same coins I do, down to year/mintmark for each and every one of those countries? The odds are, None! There are just too many variables. There are, I would wager, into the millions in possibilities, or maybe more....I would not be surprised if it was into the billions, seriously, when you take into account ancients especially. I am counting not just types but also each year/mintmark combination for each and every type. The odds that anyone on the forum would have the exact same coins as I do are slim to nil, and likewise the odds of me matching someone else's collection are...you guessed it, slim to nil! There may be some overlapping where we have the same year/mintmark for a particular type, any one of us, but to match it totally...I wouldn't bet on it. My primary source of world coins is buying bulk lots. (I've actually only done two) When you do that, you don't know what you will get...which is one of the reasons I like it, because it's a surprise no matter what. (any duplicates become my trade stash) In doing those two bulk lots, I've gotten coins ranging in age from 1893-2009. (I did one batch in 2008 and one in 09). Some of the coins, based on condition, I would not purchased as an indivigual coin. For example I got one from Peru that someone had put some scotch type tape on. Who would buy something like that for their collection? Even I wouldn't, and I would wager that my standards are the lowest on CoinTalk. Yet, that coin is now in my collection because it's the best (only!) example I have of that date/mintmark coin. When I buy an indivigual coin, I look for a few things...Does it have scratches? Normal circulation scratches I don't mind, but I don't like deep scratches. Has it been cleaned? I don't really mind a dip, but I absolutely hate hairlines from wiping. Does it have any rim dings? I don't really like them too but if they are not too distracting...or if they lower a coin I could not otherwise afford down onto my price range...I will except them. Has the coin been bent? I don't really like it but I have a few. I will try to get an upgrade but there are some coins that I would not be able to get if they were not bent. How does the coin look, color wise? I have been pretty clear in the past that I don't care for toning. I do have some examples in my collection that have toned...and they are some of my least favorite coins. I look for examples that retain the same coloration they left the mint with...but in many cases that means uncirculated and then that means I can't afford it. So, barring that, I look for a nice even coloration. For silver and nickel, I like a slate gray coloration, for copper, if I can't have mint red, I want it to look like milk chocolate. It's essentially important to me that the coin be even in color, be it factory fresh or aged like a fine wine or cheese. I don't mind darker fields with lighter devices, as long as it was aquired through wear and not a wipe. One thing that is an absolute deal breaker for me is a hole. Unless it was something like the only one in existance, holes mean no buy for me. (And if it was the only one, even with a hole, I couldn't afford it) I also don't accept whizzing(polishing) and I have none in my collection that I am aware of, I don't guarentee that I am knowledgeable to spot them if I do...I'm still a rookie really with 2 years and one month only into this hobby. I also really dislike verdigris...and having that present on a coin means I want to upgrade it. I have even "Upgraded" to a lower grade coin without verdigris over a higher graded one with it. Lucky for me most of my collection is still of a circulating type! Do other forum members have the same guidelines for their collection as I do? Maybe, I really don't know. If they do, I would guess their collection does look similar to mine. But then again, my standards are low...like I said above, probably the lowest on CoinTalk. I am sure most collectors have more strict standards than I do...I just want to have an example of that date/mintmark in my collection, and if I can, I am happy. Every thing I say I look for above, I could honestly say I have something in my collection that I say I don't want, except for holed coins (not counting the few world issues that are supposed to have holes, of course) I have multiple toned, bent, wiped, or otherwise damaged coins in my collection...and I love them all the same. I kind of feel like I am protecting them. I am sure it is silly, but I feel that if I don't save them, who will? Even problem coins have a story to tell, and I feel that my stewardship of them keeps them from being melted, further abused, or otherwise lost to history. And I'm not talking raritys here, just common everyday stuff that most people consider junk, I love. My motto is: Another man's trash is MY treasure![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
I think we all feel our collections are Unique...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...