Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
I Think I'm An Unsophisticated Numismatist
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Mike Thornton, post: 4501172, member: 105289"]Not sophisticated but trying to be. I collect Morgans and am interested in varieties. Not hard core but I do look for them to break up the boredom as I can only look at the same series for so long and they begin to look the same. Currently I have examples of nearly all the circulation strike Morgans. Missing only 8 examples like the 89-CC, 93-S, 95-S, etc. Since, in a decent grade, these are all out of my price range, unless I stumble on the right 6 numbers for Power Ball, I've resorted to examining my set for the Top 50 or 100 VAM's. Hoping to find a treasure in my safe that I didn't realize I had only to adjust my estimate of value when it comes time to liquidate.</p><p><br /></p><p>That said, I guess I have one foot in and one foot out of the boat. I like them if they can be seen without magnification, or at least nothing higher then 5x. This allowed me to discover that I have several examples of 7/8 TF's. Both weak and strong. 78 Rev 79, 88-O Hot Lips, etc. Several of the varieties command a significant premium so I guess I look closer for fear of "leaving money on the table" in the future. Plus I think some of them are pretty cool to own. The other driver is how uncommon are they. Like the DDO 55 Lincoln, or several of the "No S" proof Lincoln's. I mentioned in an earlier post, different subject, that I started in the late 60's through mid 70', quit for a while then started up again. What started me on varieties happened in 1973 when my boss, also a collector, opened a new bank roll of dimes. He always did a quick scan for 90%ers. This time, two coins stood out. One looked "normal" on the obverse but the reverse was half silver (copper-nickel) and half copper core, fully struck. The second was only the copper core, missing both copper-nickel plates. You could partially see the devices but the coin appeared to be a full de-lamination of outer layers. Not sure what he ended up doing with it or what it was valued at or if it had any value above 10 cents.</p><p><br /></p><p>To each his own. If you like them collect them, if you don't or simply don't care, that's fine too. As long as you enjoy the hobby and try to perpetuate it. In the not to distant future I wonder if anyone will be trying to collect cryptocurrency for varieties or mint errors. Now wouldn't that be something rare. I guess you'd have to be searching for computer coding errors....right? <i>(weak attempt at humor)</i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Mike Thornton, post: 4501172, member: 105289"]Not sophisticated but trying to be. I collect Morgans and am interested in varieties. Not hard core but I do look for them to break up the boredom as I can only look at the same series for so long and they begin to look the same. Currently I have examples of nearly all the circulation strike Morgans. Missing only 8 examples like the 89-CC, 93-S, 95-S, etc. Since, in a decent grade, these are all out of my price range, unless I stumble on the right 6 numbers for Power Ball, I've resorted to examining my set for the Top 50 or 100 VAM's. Hoping to find a treasure in my safe that I didn't realize I had only to adjust my estimate of value when it comes time to liquidate. That said, I guess I have one foot in and one foot out of the boat. I like them if they can be seen without magnification, or at least nothing higher then 5x. This allowed me to discover that I have several examples of 7/8 TF's. Both weak and strong. 78 Rev 79, 88-O Hot Lips, etc. Several of the varieties command a significant premium so I guess I look closer for fear of "leaving money on the table" in the future. Plus I think some of them are pretty cool to own. The other driver is how uncommon are they. Like the DDO 55 Lincoln, or several of the "No S" proof Lincoln's. I mentioned in an earlier post, different subject, that I started in the late 60's through mid 70', quit for a while then started up again. What started me on varieties happened in 1973 when my boss, also a collector, opened a new bank roll of dimes. He always did a quick scan for 90%ers. This time, two coins stood out. One looked "normal" on the obverse but the reverse was half silver (copper-nickel) and half copper core, fully struck. The second was only the copper core, missing both copper-nickel plates. You could partially see the devices but the coin appeared to be a full de-lamination of outer layers. Not sure what he ended up doing with it or what it was valued at or if it had any value above 10 cents. To each his own. If you like them collect them, if you don't or simply don't care, that's fine too. As long as you enjoy the hobby and try to perpetuate it. In the not to distant future I wonder if anyone will be trying to collect cryptocurrency for varieties or mint errors. Now wouldn't that be something rare. I guess you'd have to be searching for computer coding errors....right? [I](weak attempt at humor)[/I][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
I Think I'm An Unsophisticated Numismatist
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...