Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 4634371, member: 24314&quot;]Mountain Man, posted: &quot;<b><span style="color: #b30000">IMO. <span style="color: #000000">That sums it up, doesn&#039;t it</span></span></b>? Without the coin in hand, all any of us can do is put forth our opinions and without a large number of &quot;experts&quot; agreeing with it, it doesn&#039;t even buy a cup of coffee.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>Absolutely not!&nbsp; Unless a person is a &quot;sheep&quot; who does not care.&nbsp;&nbsp; There are two expert error guys in this discussion.&nbsp; One writes a column and one wrote a book.&nbsp; This coin is a black or white example of one or the other opinion.&nbsp; The &quot;clues&quot; on the OP&#039;s coin are very obvious to me.&nbsp; <span style="color: #660066">We know the coin has streaks of a different color and different <b>width</b>.&nbsp; We can see the coin is laminated, a characteristic very often found on alloy errors</span> and NOT SEEN up to now on the error type he defends: roller marks. </p><p><br /></p><p>This has been a respectable discussion.&nbsp; I believe there is a clear answer.&nbsp; I&#039;ve asked several questions to make folks think.&nbsp; Anyone who is satisfied with the present state of this discussion is free to drop out.&nbsp; <i>I am waiting for anyone to change my mind.</i>&nbsp; The image of the OP&#039;s coin has all the evidence needed to make a determination.&nbsp; I&#039;ve seen thousands of incorrect alloy mixed coins under the scope.&nbsp; So far, this is one of them.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in