Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;MadMartigan, post: 2123723, member: 58925&quot;]I am at a loss why everyone is bashing on the OP.&nbsp; Sure he didn&#039;t word everything correct but both ebay and ampex were in the wrong.</p><p><br /></p><p>First off you can throw out the 1948 info (although as big seller you should make sure all that info is correct it obviously filled in the first year of production in that field which was different that what was listed anywhere else in the description or auction).&nbsp; The description lists original rolls which is not what was sent.&nbsp; That&#039;s not an autofill thats what you put in your description and thereby you should be obligated to send what you are claiming to be selling.&nbsp; Also the picture was wrong so now you have given a false image as well as a false description how can you think the buyer should beware.&nbsp; You have completely misled them in three different areas description, picture and autofilled data.&nbsp; So you think you can get away with not paying return shipping by throwing it out there that you don&#039;t do so.&nbsp; So you can completely list the item wrong and not provide accurate pictures and when the buyer gets something that he is not happy with you can say well up yours.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is not how Ebay is supposed to work.&nbsp; Ebay is normally very buyer friendly but are being complete jerks about this because ampex is obviously a big sponsor and supporter.&nbsp; The OP has a valid concern that was not addressed correctly by ampex and tried to go through ebay because thats what your supposed to do with a SNAD.&nbsp; But rather than getting a resolution from ebay he is getting the run around because EBAY is clearly favoring ampex over the buyer even though they were in the wrong.</p><p><br /></p><p>Seriously people.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in