Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;KBBPLL, post: 8046598, member: 104064&quot;]So are these both essentially dateless coins, or did the grader think they saw enough of a date to call it 1796? If they are dateless, it&#039;s hard to understand how a TPG could mess that up on such a valuable coin. What else would they have to go on besides the reverse type, which is clearly not 1796? Heritage says there are &quot;probably no more than two dozen known.&quot; On another genuine example, HA says &quot;This piece shows the diagnostic bisecting die crack across the obverse that explains the rarity of the variety. None are known without the crack...&quot; Where is the crack on these two? It boggles my mind to think that both major TPGs could screw this up. </p><p><br /></p><p>Your process is a good one. It can also lead to new discoveries.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in