Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
I Seem to Be Missing Something Important
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Numbers, post: 1277664, member: 11668"]Also, if small-size notes are what you plan to collect, then don't worry too much about Friedberg numbers (or any other catalog numbers). They exist, but they aren't essential.</p><p><br /></p><p>Catalog numbers are much more significant when it comes to large-size notes, where a single series (say, the 1880 $20 USN) can exist with over a dozen different signature combinations, several different seal colors and sizes, several different paper types.... In these cases, you really need some sort of cataloguing system to keep everything straight, and the Friedberg one is the recognized standard.</p><p><br /></p><p>Small-size notes have far less complexity in these aspects. Each series has one signature combination, and most series have no color/paper/printing varieties at all. And those varieties that *do* exist are often not incorporated into Friedberg's numbering anyway; for example, it's only recently that the light vs. dark seals on the early FRNs have been listed, and they still use the same number with just "lgs" or "dgs" added. For small-size, you'll do fine to just list the series/denom/type, plus a variety in the few cases where it's needed (experimentals, etc.) This is why books like Hessler-Chambliss don't even bother giving catalog numbers to small-size notes.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Numbers, post: 1277664, member: 11668"]Also, if small-size notes are what you plan to collect, then don't worry too much about Friedberg numbers (or any other catalog numbers). They exist, but they aren't essential. Catalog numbers are much more significant when it comes to large-size notes, where a single series (say, the 1880 $20 USN) can exist with over a dozen different signature combinations, several different seal colors and sizes, several different paper types.... In these cases, you really need some sort of cataloguing system to keep everything straight, and the Friedberg one is the recognized standard. Small-size notes have far less complexity in these aspects. Each series has one signature combination, and most series have no color/paper/printing varieties at all. And those varieties that *do* exist are often not incorporated into Friedberg's numbering anyway; for example, it's only recently that the light vs. dark seals on the early FRNs have been listed, and they still use the same number with just "lgs" or "dgs" added. For small-size, you'll do fine to just list the series/denom/type, plus a variety in the few cases where it's needed (experimentals, etc.) This is why books like Hessler-Chambliss don't even bother giving catalog numbers to small-size notes.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
I Seem to Be Missing Something Important
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...