Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 24598435, member: 112&quot;]If memory serves, the info came from the mint archives.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I think that very unlikely as physically weighing the coins shows us they&#039;re not. Of course we also see that with very, very few exceptions, the coins (other than those with extreme wear, defined as VG or lower) fall within the weight tolerances as specified in the Almanac. </p><p><br /></p><p>Given that, what then explains the weight differences in the Almanac ? The only thing I can think of, given that there are only a few, is possible typos that have occurred over the years as the various editions were published. But that&#039;s just a guess. And the reason it&#039;s my guess is because over the course of my life I&#039;ve found it beyond rare that any book does not have its share of typos.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in