Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;philologus_1, post: 7807315, member: 92212&quot;]Well, thank you kindly!&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>My first thought when I saw your example was to wonder if it had been halved to make a half-prutah of change. It&#039;s conceivable! Anyway, it is a cool piece, and has enough detail to attribute it!&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Their &quot;Year 39&quot; included the last portion of AD 8 and the first portion of AD 9.&nbsp; So technically, Year 39 itself should be described as AD 8/9.&nbsp; However, based on what is known about (a) when Coponius died, (b) what coin type he issued and when it was issued, and (c) when Ambibulus gained the title, we can know that this coin type was produced beginning in AD 9 (iow: the latter potion of Year 39).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in