Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
I need help for a friend who got scam by a coin shop
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="CamaroDMD, post: 1666823, member: 5233"]First off, I stated that I didn't appreciate being called "chief" and asked you not to refer to me as that...there is nothing wrong with that. Those of us with Native American heritage don't appreciate such comments. I was perfectly civil. I gave you the option of referring to me by my username and if you chose not to I offered another suggestion. I did not "introduce" my patients or any "issues" to this thread. Another member mentioned my patients and I answered his statement. Plus, there were no "issues" about them discussed. You implied that I am taking advantage of my patients with the following statement:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I then defended it and explained how I deal with patients whom I am concerned may not be capable of making decisions for themselves. But, I certainly did not "introduce" my patients into this discussion in any way.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>You don't see it bothering me much? I have said several times that what the dealer did was "reprehensible." At no point did I say it was acceptable. I said based on my understanding of the law...I don't see anything illegal about it. But, I never once stated it was acceptable or moral behavior. I felt that your comparison of this situation to someone dressing provocatively being responsible for their own rape was an incredibly immature comparison. I understood what you meant the first time I read it, but I don't agree that it is an appropriate comparison. It is no different that saying the guy wearing red in the Crips neighborhood deserves to get shot. Those are inappropriate comparisons. </p><p><br /></p><p>I am also not "ranting" about my business or my patients. Every time (with the exception of saying that you could alternatively refer to me as "doctor" rather than my username if you chose) I mentioned by "business" it was in direct response to someone else's statement.</p><p><br /></p><p>Finally, based on your own posting about Florida laws you have stated that she is not an "elder." I agree with you, she is above the age of 60 and is therefore a senior citizen. But, if you actually read this link, the very link you posted you will see that she is not a "elderly person":</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I have posted the Florida legal definition of "elderly person" twice before in this thread and someone else has posted it as well. But, I will post it again for a third time and you will undoubtedly ignore it because it doesn't fit your argument. Here again, for the third time, is the Florida legal definition posted in it's entirety from the very link you posted:</p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p>Again, this person may be a senior citizen based upon her age alone...but nowhere has the OP stated that she is in anyway impaired as this definition requires. </p><p><br /></p><p>You keep stating that I have no legal knowledge...it's true I have no legal training. But, I can read. I have asked you several times what your legal expertise is and you have ignored it. I therefore assume you have none and are concealing that fact because it's easier to attack my background than state yours is as weak as mine.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I "declared victory" because I posted a well reasoned statement about how this woman doesn't fit into the "elderly person" description based on the Florida law that you posted. I also admitted per your accusations that I am not a legal expert and I asked for your legal credentials. Your response was the following statement:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I felt that this statement was proof that you had no other well reason material to discuss with me so you decided to sink to juvenile statements about my patients. Based on that, I figured that you had nothing left to add to the discussion. That is why I "declared victory."</p><p><br /></p><p>As for my moderator comments, I asked everyone to stop making insulting comments towards each other and stated that we needed to get back on topic. You seem to want to argue that with me by accusing me of "ranting." Yet, my very next post after that statement was an attempt to get the thread back on topic...which you immediately tried to derail. Now, I suggest that YOU stay on topic for the rest of this thread. If not, I will personally deal with YOU.</p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p>I think that what the dealer did was highly immoral...as I have stated several times before in this thread.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="CamaroDMD, post: 1666823, member: 5233"]First off, I stated that I didn't appreciate being called "chief" and asked you not to refer to me as that...there is nothing wrong with that. Those of us with Native American heritage don't appreciate such comments. I was perfectly civil. I gave you the option of referring to me by my username and if you chose not to I offered another suggestion. I did not "introduce" my patients or any "issues" to this thread. Another member mentioned my patients and I answered his statement. Plus, there were no "issues" about them discussed. You implied that I am taking advantage of my patients with the following statement: I then defended it and explained how I deal with patients whom I am concerned may not be capable of making decisions for themselves. But, I certainly did not "introduce" my patients into this discussion in any way. You don't see it bothering me much? I have said several times that what the dealer did was "reprehensible." At no point did I say it was acceptable. I said based on my understanding of the law...I don't see anything illegal about it. But, I never once stated it was acceptable or moral behavior. I felt that your comparison of this situation to someone dressing provocatively being responsible for their own rape was an incredibly immature comparison. I understood what you meant the first time I read it, but I don't agree that it is an appropriate comparison. It is no different that saying the guy wearing red in the Crips neighborhood deserves to get shot. Those are inappropriate comparisons. I am also not "ranting" about my business or my patients. Every time (with the exception of saying that you could alternatively refer to me as "doctor" rather than my username if you chose) I mentioned by "business" it was in direct response to someone else's statement. Finally, based on your own posting about Florida laws you have stated that she is not an "elder." I agree with you, she is above the age of 60 and is therefore a senior citizen. But, if you actually read this link, the very link you posted you will see that she is not a "elderly person": I have posted the Florida legal definition of "elderly person" twice before in this thread and someone else has posted it as well. But, I will post it again for a third time and you will undoubtedly ignore it because it doesn't fit your argument. Here again, for the third time, is the Florida legal definition posted in it's entirety from the very link you posted: Again, this person may be a senior citizen based upon her age alone...but nowhere has the OP stated that she is in anyway impaired as this definition requires. You keep stating that I have no legal knowledge...it's true I have no legal training. But, I can read. I have asked you several times what your legal expertise is and you have ignored it. I therefore assume you have none and are concealing that fact because it's easier to attack my background than state yours is as weak as mine. I "declared victory" because I posted a well reasoned statement about how this woman doesn't fit into the "elderly person" description based on the Florida law that you posted. I also admitted per your accusations that I am not a legal expert and I asked for your legal credentials. Your response was the following statement: I felt that this statement was proof that you had no other well reason material to discuss with me so you decided to sink to juvenile statements about my patients. Based on that, I figured that you had nothing left to add to the discussion. That is why I "declared victory." As for my moderator comments, I asked everyone to stop making insulting comments towards each other and stated that we needed to get back on topic. You seem to want to argue that with me by accusing me of "ranting." Yet, my very next post after that statement was an attempt to get the thread back on topic...which you immediately tried to derail. Now, I suggest that YOU stay on topic for the rest of this thread. If not, I will personally deal with YOU. I think that what the dealer did was highly immoral...as I have stated several times before in this thread.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
I need help for a friend who got scam by a coin shop
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...