I know I sound crazy for bringing up the same topics, but... (Large Denominations)

Discussion in 'Paper Money' started by Drago the Wolf, Feb 20, 2012.

  1. rodeoclown

    rodeoclown Dodging Bulls

    We'll see them when snickers cost $25. ;)
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. coleguy

    coleguy Coin Collector

    You have to realize that even when they were making $500 and $1000 notes, it wasn't for general commerce. People didn't have them in their wallets walking around town. You couldn't get them at most banks. They were intended entirely as a means to transferring large sums of money between banks, as this was before electronic transfers. This is what the government will tell you when you write to them. 99% of the people aren't going to utilize bills that large, even if they are available to them. It's much easier and safer to use plastic in higher amounts. I see your point, but from a practical standpoint, it's never going to happen. They are cutting dollar coins as a means to eliminate waste (though they're wrong) so producing more denominations that won't get used just won't get far.
    Guy
     
  4. Dr Kegg

    Dr Kegg Star Note Fanatic

    You just stole my thunder Cole! I was going to say the same thing about what the $500 and larger denomination notes were used for! :yes:
     
  5. coleguy

    coleguy Coin Collector

    Sorry Doc. I just touched on it, so you could fill in the blanks.
    Guy
     
  6. ctrl

    ctrl Member

    1. Everything Guy said, these weren't for people to use normally.
    2. A $500 bill in 1929 would be like a $6500 bill today.
    3. If anything I'd think a $250 bill would be most practical.
    4. Electronic transactions are the present & future.
     
  7. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    This guy has a better chance of curing cancer, aids, Alzhiemers and Parkinsons all at the same time and all by himself!
     
  8. lettow

    lettow Senior Member

  9. Dr Kegg

    Dr Kegg Star Note Fanatic

    No need, your explanation was succinct.
     
  10. Numbers

    Numbers Senior Member

    I've heard that from multiple sources too, but those sources are wrong. :rolleyes:

    Here's the explanation direct from the *original* source:

    If anyone at the Treasury in 1969 had thought they were fighting crime by taking this action, you can bet that they would've patted themselves on the back by highlighting that fact in the press release. Such effects just weren't on their radar at the time....

    By the way, I got that press release from the O'Donnell book, which also provides the following statistics on the number of high-denomination notes outstanding:

    As of 12/31/1945:
    $500: 903,404
    $1000: 797,852
    $5000: 1,405
    $10000: 2,327

    As of 12/31/1968:
    $500: 488,295
    $1000: 291,894
    $5000: 634
    $10000: 383 (and 100 of those were at Binion's Horseshoe!)

    So despite the inflation, and population growth, that had occurred during those 23 years, the usage of these denominations had declined sharply. The lack-of-demand explanation fits the facts.
     
  11. onecoinpony

    onecoinpony Member

    He's right, no one of importance will ever read your letters/emails. Come on man this is America, your voice counts. You need to recruit a heavy hitter to present your idea to the President. I'd start with Monica Lewinsky.
     
  12. Porsche2007

    Porsche2007 Senior Member

    Correct.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page