Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;okbustchaser, post: 6609853, member: 72642&quot;]I would say that it is 114.&nbsp; To be sure, check the relationship between the D over E on the reverse.&nbsp; On the small stars the stand of E is centered under stand of D; on 114 it is well to the right of D.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for TGP attributions <b>NEVER </b>trust them.&nbsp; Always do your own attributions or at least ask someone else who specializes in whatever series it may be.&nbsp; Although they are getting much better at one time at least one out of every 10 Overton attributions that I saw were wrong and it was my understanding that they didn&#039;t back them up under their grade guarantee.&nbsp; Although they would correct it if you sent it in for a second look--if, to use an example that I still see regularly--they call an 1827 O-106 an O-127 you are on the hook for the 5X to 7X premium that you would have paid.</p><p><br /></p><p>It is also my understanding that CAC doesn&#039;t consider the attribution at all so in this case they didn&#039;t miss it.</p><p><br /></p><p>At least in your case here there isn&#039;t that much of a price variation between the 2--and in your favor, to boot.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in