Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
I finally got Lucilla!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Tejas, post: 8014904, member: 84905"]Actually, historians regard Claudius mostly as an unsuitable and largely incompetent emperor, who depended on his women and the capabilities of some freed slaves for government. The fact that he was still able to spend vast amounts of money on conquest, building programs and direct donations to the military and the public suggest that there was still a lot of money around despite Caligula's squandering.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The passage below is from Wikipedia:</p><p><br /></p><p>"However, some historians have shown scepticism towards the large number of sesterces quoted by Suetonius and Dio. According to Wilkinson, Caligula's use of precious metals to mint coins throughout his principate indicates that the treasury most likely never fell into bankruptcy.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-Wilkinson_2003_10-52" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-Wilkinson_2003_10-52" rel="nofollow">[52]</a> He does point out, however, that it is difficult to ascertain whether the purported 'squandered wealth' was from the treasury alone due to the blurring of "the division between the private wealth of the emperor and his income as head of state."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-Wilkinson_2003_10-52" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-Wilkinson_2003_10-52" rel="nofollow">[52]</a> Furthermore, Alston points out that Caligula's successor, <b>Claudius, was able to donate 15,000 sesterces to each member of the praetorian guard in 41,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-tacitus-calig-50-25" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-tacitus-calig-50-25" rel="nofollow">[25]</a> suggesting the Roman treasury was solvent.</b><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-53" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-53" rel="nofollow"><b>[</b>53]</a>"</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Again, I think Caligula's reign was anything but a blessing, but his impact on the Roman Empire and even the reign of his immediate successor appear to be nearly negligible.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Tejas, post: 8014904, member: 84905"]Actually, historians regard Claudius mostly as an unsuitable and largely incompetent emperor, who depended on his women and the capabilities of some freed slaves for government. The fact that he was still able to spend vast amounts of money on conquest, building programs and direct donations to the military and the public suggest that there was still a lot of money around despite Caligula's squandering. The passage below is from Wikipedia: "However, some historians have shown scepticism towards the large number of sesterces quoted by Suetonius and Dio. According to Wilkinson, Caligula's use of precious metals to mint coins throughout his principate indicates that the treasury most likely never fell into bankruptcy.[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-Wilkinson_2003_10-52'][52][/URL] He does point out, however, that it is difficult to ascertain whether the purported 'squandered wealth' was from the treasury alone due to the blurring of "the division between the private wealth of the emperor and his income as head of state."[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-Wilkinson_2003_10-52'][52][/URL] Furthermore, Alston points out that Caligula's successor, [B]Claudius, was able to donate 15,000 sesterces to each member of the praetorian guard in 41,[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-tacitus-calig-50-25'][25][/URL] suggesting the Roman treasury was solvent.[/B][URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#cite_note-53'][B][[/B]53][/URL]" Again, I think Caligula's reign was anything but a blessing, but his impact on the Roman Empire and even the reign of his immediate successor appear to be nearly negligible.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
I finally got Lucilla!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...