Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Roman Collector, post: 7998143, member: 75937&quot;]That&#039;s one of the more expensive reverse types for this otherwise common empress. Szaivert dates the issue to AD 161/2. If this is to be believed (and not all authorities agree), she would have been 12 or 13. </p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/lucilla-vota-pvblica-denarius-jpg.1379960/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p>Lucilla, AD 161-169.</p><p>Roman AR denarius, 3.38 g, 18.7 mm, 12 h.</p><p>Rome, AD 161/162.</p><p>Obv: LVCILLAE AVG ANTONINI AVG F, bare-headed and draped bust, right.</p><p>Rev: VOTA / PVBLI / CA within laurel-wreath.</p><p>Refs: RIC 791; BMCRE 329-330; Cohen 98; RCV 5494; MIR 22-4/10a; CRE 275.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in