Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;John Burgess, post: 7932846, member: 105098&quot;]Yeah, the pictures are bad, but this is definitely RDV-007 the space between the M and E in America is just way too wide to be the Wide AM THat&#039;s the one area I can see well in the pictures.</p><p><br /></p><p>To be honest, the 1999 is the hardest of the Wide AM trio to find, so it&#039;s likely that&#039;s going to be wrongly identified whenever someone say they think they have one. </p><p><br /></p><p>RDV-06, the one you are looking for have very even &quot;A M E R I C A&quot; spacing and any time it looks like &quot;AM ERICA&quot; you are dealing with RVD-007. it really more about how far off the FG initials are and the gap between the overall spacing of the AME, minting issues, circulation can cause flattening of letters or pushes that make JUSt going of the AM space alone, or the FG G font, inconclusive and ca be misleading. got to take all of the diagnostics as a whole. even the spacing of &quot;TAT&quot; in States. </p><p><br /></p><p>RDV-006</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1371893[/ATTACH]</p><p>RDV-007</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Close:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1371897[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Wide:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1371899[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in