Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
I don't think that's who you think it is: Coins that look nothing like who they're supposed to
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="eparch, post: 8025618, member: 89211"]An excellent idea for a thread.</p><p><br /></p><p>Julius Caesar is described in the ancient sources as having a scrawny neck, and this is often shown on his portrait coins, such as this posthumous one</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1391057[/ATTACH]</p><p>Julius Caesar AR Denarius. L. Livineius Regulus, moneyer. Rome, 42 BC.</p><p>Wreathed head to right; laurel branch behind, winged caduceus before</p><p> / Bull charging to right; L•LIVINEIVS above, REGVLVS below.</p><p><br /></p><p>Crawford 494/24;Sear HRCI 115 </p><p><br /></p><p>Ex Conte Alessandro Magnaguti Collection, P. & P. Santamaria, 14 October 1948, lot 330.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>However, on one issue, which Sear in HRCI dates as the first after</p><p>his assassination, the portrayal of the neck makes this portrait almost a caricature. He appears to believe it was done in great haste </p><p><br /></p><p>This coin was once part of Andrew McCabe's collection and I hope he won't mind my appending his note on it , proposing different dating to Sear and Crawford.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1391059[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Julius Caesar AR Denarius. Rome, January-February 44 BC. M. Mettius, moneyer.</p><p><br /></p><p>IMPER upwards to left, CAESAR downwards to right; wreathed head of Caesar right; lituus and simpulum behind</p><p><br /></p><p> M•METTIVS, Venus Victrix standing to left, holding Victory in outstretched right hand and transverse sceptre in left, resting her left elbow on shield set on celestial globe; D to left.</p><p><br /></p><p>Crawford 480/17</p><p><br /></p><p>From the Andrew McCabe Collection, collector's ticket included;</p><p>Privately purchased from Münzhandlung Ritter, 2006.</p><p><br /></p><p>"Ted Buttrey in 'Caesar at Play: Some Preparations for the Parthian Campaign, 44 BCE', 2015, makes a convincing case that all the Caesar portrait types in RRC 480 excepting the one accidental mule, an error coin wrongly classified as RRC 480/20, were struck prior to his death in March and to fund his Parthian campaign. Bernhard Woytek makes similar arguments in Arma et Nummi. I have always thought the sequential order proposed by Alföldi and adopted unchanged by Crawford, didn't allow for the evidently parallel workshops shown by the very different styles and flans of each type. I have long been convinced that all of RRC 480/1 through RRC 480/19 plus the fractions were struck in the first two and a half months of the year. Certainly the number of dies - less than 200 - makes that a physically easy task. I discussed this with Buttrey and Woytek (on a Saturday afternoon in Cambridge three years ago) who are totally supportive, and I hope to follow with an alternative study to the Alföldi/Crawford arrangement in time. First I have to work on bronzes for a while though. Anyway, this Mettius denarius was certainly struck during Julius Caesar's lifetime. It has a particularly fine reverse strike for an issue notable for less than fine strikes." - Andrew McCabe.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="eparch, post: 8025618, member: 89211"]An excellent idea for a thread. Julius Caesar is described in the ancient sources as having a scrawny neck, and this is often shown on his portrait coins, such as this posthumous one [ATTACH=full]1391057[/ATTACH] Julius Caesar AR Denarius. L. Livineius Regulus, moneyer. Rome, 42 BC. Wreathed head to right; laurel branch behind, winged caduceus before / Bull charging to right; L•LIVINEIVS above, REGVLVS below. Crawford 494/24;Sear HRCI 115 Ex Conte Alessandro Magnaguti Collection, P. & P. Santamaria, 14 October 1948, lot 330. However, on one issue, which Sear in HRCI dates as the first after his assassination, the portrayal of the neck makes this portrait almost a caricature. He appears to believe it was done in great haste This coin was once part of Andrew McCabe's collection and I hope he won't mind my appending his note on it , proposing different dating to Sear and Crawford. [ATTACH=full]1391059[/ATTACH] Julius Caesar AR Denarius. Rome, January-February 44 BC. M. Mettius, moneyer. IMPER upwards to left, CAESAR downwards to right; wreathed head of Caesar right; lituus and simpulum behind M•METTIVS, Venus Victrix standing to left, holding Victory in outstretched right hand and transverse sceptre in left, resting her left elbow on shield set on celestial globe; D to left. Crawford 480/17 From the Andrew McCabe Collection, collector's ticket included; Privately purchased from Münzhandlung Ritter, 2006. "Ted Buttrey in 'Caesar at Play: Some Preparations for the Parthian Campaign, 44 BCE', 2015, makes a convincing case that all the Caesar portrait types in RRC 480 excepting the one accidental mule, an error coin wrongly classified as RRC 480/20, were struck prior to his death in March and to fund his Parthian campaign. Bernhard Woytek makes similar arguments in Arma et Nummi. I have always thought the sequential order proposed by Alföldi and adopted unchanged by Crawford, didn't allow for the evidently parallel workshops shown by the very different styles and flans of each type. I have long been convinced that all of RRC 480/1 through RRC 480/19 plus the fractions were struck in the first two and a half months of the year. Certainly the number of dies - less than 200 - makes that a physically easy task. I discussed this with Buttrey and Woytek (on a Saturday afternoon in Cambridge three years ago) who are totally supportive, and I hope to follow with an alternative study to the Alföldi/Crawford arrangement in time. First I have to work on bronzes for a while though. Anyway, this Mettius denarius was certainly struck during Julius Caesar's lifetime. It has a particularly fine reverse strike for an issue notable for less than fine strikes." - Andrew McCabe.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
I don't think that's who you think it is: Coins that look nothing like who they're supposed to
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...