Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 2232481, member: 19463&quot;]If you like Sayles Volume I, great.&nbsp; I consider it untypical of the set simply because it has to be so basic covering so much.&nbsp; Volumes 2 and 3 were Greek and Roman and sold well.&nbsp; 4, 5, 6 and the unnumbered one on fakes were less popular since they cover coins relatively fewer people collect.&nbsp; The demand probably did not require updates.&nbsp; I knew less about the contents of the last volumes so I learned more from them.&nbsp; Your mileage may differ. </p><p><br /></p><p>If you plan on buying ERIC II, my review is still up:</p><p><a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=eric%20ii" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=eric%20ii" rel="nofollow">http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=eric ii</a></p><p>Some people considered me overly hard.&nbsp; Unlike Steve, I rarely touch ERIC II but mine is harder to use since it has no binding.&nbsp; I reviewed it from galley proofs and never bought a bound one.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in