Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GoldFinger1969, post: 8189498, member: 73489&quot;]<b>Thanks BB21....the CDN Monthlies were from late-2018 if that helps.</b></p><p><br /></p><p><i>Why wouldn&#039;t you see the same discrepancy in the MS-67 range for other Saints that are considered &quot;common&quot; if not in the 67 range, i.e., 1924, 1923-D, 1908 NM, 1928, etc. ??</i></p><p><br /></p><p>I know a premium for PCGS will expand as you go up in grade....<b><i>but 200% at the 67-and-above level with a PCGS pop of 36; 62 for NGC; and Roger Burdette&#039;s Saints book estimate of 60 (eliminates double-counting) ?</i></b></p><p>I thought my census numbers above were accurate, I&#039;ll double check.</p><p><br /></p><p>But with both our numbers, for a coin that isn&#039;t that super-rare....why such a big premium ?&nbsp; It appears to be confined to the 1927....I&#039;m not seeing it for other &quot;common&quot; Saints or for more rare/scarce Saints even in the 67 grade !!??</p><p>But with dozens available there ?&nbsp; If there were only 1 or 2, I could see it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Just seems to be unique to the 1927 Saint.&nbsp; I&#039;m going to look at the CDN grids a bit more and see if I see anything else among Saints, Liberty&#039;s, or non-gold coins for a coin/year/condition that is rare but not ultra- or super-rare.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in