Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="The Half Dime, post: 26430086, member: 153164"]Eh, in all honesty I don't mind the 1961s being 2 numbers apart. I wouldn't mind it even if it was a full set of 1961 in PR70. Seeing the occurrence was just crazy, and I figured I'd post it here to see what people thought. Not gonna lie, that's something I'd probably spend a whole day trying to attribute. Especially if I saw one like it that had been mislabeled. I do too. I once had a CAC mislabel, while minor it was an '1880' graded MS-62 DMPL, that was actually an 1880-S. Last week on GreatCollections, I saw one that would be a big oof anywhere else - a 1912-S nickel labeled by PCGS as a dime. Imagine if the submitter organized a 1950-64 proof set lot like this. That'd be cool if all of those coins stayed together since they'd be kinda intertwined. For some collectors, it'd cause a fit of rage, especially if they had the full 1961 set that was interrupted by one coin. For me, I plan to sell them, so it's no big deal. I wonder: did your Maple Leaf set once include a cent? That looks to be the only missing one.[/QUOTE]