Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 2757899, member: 15309&quot;]I have already explained it several times.&nbsp; And those two coins, while nice, don&#039;t come close to the overall visual impact that the coin in the OP has.&nbsp; So while you point to a generic dipped Washington with nice surfaces as the prototype MS67, I point to this MS66 as the reason why the coin in the OP is graded MS67.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Washington%20Quarters/WQ1951NGCMS66.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Do me a favor, please grade the following PCGS graded quarter.&nbsp; Give me your grade and reasons for the grade, then give me what you think PCGS graded it.&nbsp; Thanks in advance.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://dyn3.heritagestatic.com/lf?set=path%5B1%2F5%2F4%2F6%2F6%2F15466018%5D%2Csizedata%5B850x600%5D&amp;call=url%5Bfile%3Aproduct.chain%5D" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><img src="https://dyn2.heritagestatic.com/lf?set=path%5B1%2F5%2F4%2F6%2F6%2F15466023%5D%2Csizedata%5B850x600%5D&amp;call=url%5Bfile%3Aproduct.chain%5D" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in