Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
I am completely stumped on this MS-67+ Washington Quarter
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2756976, member: 24314"]First of all, this is a great thread - not boring and quite educational, and everyone is playing nice. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie14" alt=":angelic:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">Lehigh96, posted: "Now, if you please, provide me with your grades</span> <b><i><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)">sir</span></i></b>." Hopefully, there will be no more of this, <b>sir</b>.</p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">jtlee321, posted: "I just get upset at what can only be described as <b><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)">politics</span></b> going on at the TPG's. And each and every time I come across a blatant example such as this, I will out it, as I hope anyone else would."</span></p><p><br /></p><p>This is taking a big jump into the unknown. Many do not know how this coin could possibly be graded the way it was. Others think it is correctly graded. I guess that should remove "politics" from the equation.</p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">TypeCoin971793, posted: "There isn't any of this drama over in the ancients forum. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie50" alt=":happy:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">No nitpicky grades, no competing in registry sets, no being anal about actually handling your coins... and a blatant (friendly) loathing of slabs. Everyone loves their coins for the stories they tell and the history they witnessed. A very different attitude from collectors bashing each other for the sake of 1-2 points on a grade, or the presence of a DDO, or a berry in a different place than on other coins. I get a feeling that very few people appreciate the history these coins represent as they have become just a commodity</span>. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />"</p><p><br /></p><p>That is true. Ancient collectors tend to be more mature <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie26" alt=":bookworm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> collectors. By that I mean as many collectors learn more about their coins and numismatic history, many of them gravitate to collecting ancients. There is still a lot to be discovered.</p><p><br /></p><p>That said, most coins posted on the ancient forum are corroded lumps <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie96" alt=":vomit:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> of tooled-up <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> and cleaned <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie23" alt=":bigtears:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> ugly metal. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie57" alt=":jawdrop:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Unless you collect common, high grade Roman denarii, you'll need to sell a used car in order to get virtually any artistic, high-grade, attractive, large piece of Greek silver. That's why I gravitated to small Greek bronze. So with ancients, except for authenticity, there is not much to fight about.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie50" alt=":happy:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Additionally, I find it extremely ridiculous to read all the bashing of ancient slabs. Quite similar to a bunch of U.S. collectors <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie30" alt=":bucktooth:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie79" alt=":rage:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> quibbling over grades. One day, as more and more ancients get entombed, you'll start to see the nits picking at the surface condition, style, and grade assigned to ancients. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">Lehigh96, asked: "I want everyone to grade this coin using their own standards, not NGC's. The condition is that I want you to grade each element of grading separately. I will start.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">Surface Preservation: MS65</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">Luster: MS67</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">Strike: MS68</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">Eye Appeal: MS67"</span></p><p><br /></p><p>My opinion:</p><p><br /></p><p>Surface Preservation: MS-63 Detracting marks in PFA. <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)">If you don't see them</span> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie46" alt=":facepalm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />: MS-67</p><p>Luster: MS-66 or MS-67 Above average and fully original. NOT MS-68 as it is not attractive.</p><p>Strike: Normal, nothing special. MS-anything. I'll go with the middle MS-65 as not weak and not particularly strong either.</p><p>Eye Appeal: MS-65 to MS-66 Pleasing to above average BUT ONLY DUE to color of splotchy toning.</p><p><br /></p><p>Final grade if I were a TPG: MS-65 Star or +</p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">SuperDave, posted: </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)">Luster: Not present, in these images. I'm aware Washingtons don't manifest luster the same as other coins, but I see no cartwheel at all. Quite prepared to change my mind with images more suited to depicting luster than the typical Heritage overexposure. No opinion, but leaning "favorable."</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)"><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">That coin is a headlight with full blazing and colorful luster.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 179)"></span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2756976, member: 24314"]First of all, this is a great thread - not boring and quite educational, and everyone is playing nice. :angelic: [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 179)]Lehigh96, posted: "Now, if you please, provide me with your grades[/COLOR] [B][I][COLOR=rgb(255, 0, 0)]sir[/COLOR][/I][/B]." Hopefully, there will be no more of this, [B]sir[/B]. [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 179)]jtlee321, posted: "I just get upset at what can only be described as [B][COLOR=rgb(255, 0, 0)]politics[/COLOR][/B] going on at the TPG's. And each and every time I come across a blatant example such as this, I will out it, as I hope anyone else would."[/COLOR] This is taking a big jump into the unknown. Many do not know how this coin could possibly be graded the way it was. Others think it is correctly graded. I guess that should remove "politics" from the equation. [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 179)]TypeCoin971793, posted: "There isn't any of this drama over in the ancients forum. :happy: No nitpicky grades, no competing in registry sets, no being anal about actually handling your coins... and a blatant (friendly) loathing of slabs. Everyone loves their coins for the stories they tell and the history they witnessed. A very different attitude from collectors bashing each other for the sake of 1-2 points on a grade, or the presence of a DDO, or a berry in a different place than on other coins. I get a feeling that very few people appreciate the history these coins represent as they have become just a commodity[/COLOR]. :(" That is true. Ancient collectors tend to be more mature :bookworm: collectors. By that I mean as many collectors learn more about their coins and numismatic history, many of them gravitate to collecting ancients. There is still a lot to be discovered. That said, most coins posted on the ancient forum are corroded lumps :vomit: of tooled-up :( and cleaned :bigtears: ugly metal. :jawdrop: Unless you collect common, high grade Roman denarii, you'll need to sell a used car in order to get virtually any artistic, high-grade, attractive, large piece of Greek silver. That's why I gravitated to small Greek bronze. So with ancients, except for authenticity, there is not much to fight about.:happy: Additionally, I find it extremely ridiculous to read all the bashing of ancient slabs. Quite similar to a bunch of U.S. collectors :bucktooth: :rage: quibbling over grades. One day, as more and more ancients get entombed, you'll start to see the nits picking at the surface condition, style, and grade assigned to ancients. :hilarious::hilarious::hilarious::hilarious: [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 179)]Lehigh96, asked: "I want everyone to grade this coin using their own standards, not NGC's. The condition is that I want you to grade each element of grading separately. I will start. Surface Preservation: MS65 Luster: MS67 Strike: MS68 Eye Appeal: MS67"[/COLOR] My opinion: Surface Preservation: MS-63 Detracting marks in PFA. [COLOR=rgb(255, 0, 0)]If you don't see them[/COLOR] :facepalm:: MS-67 Luster: MS-66 or MS-67 Above average and fully original. NOT MS-68 as it is not attractive. Strike: Normal, nothing special. MS-anything. I'll go with the middle MS-65 as not weak and not particularly strong either. Eye Appeal: MS-65 to MS-66 Pleasing to above average BUT ONLY DUE to color of splotchy toning. Final grade if I were a TPG: MS-65 Star or + [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 179)]SuperDave, posted: Luster: Not present, in these images. I'm aware Washingtons don't manifest luster the same as other coins, but I see no cartwheel at all. Quite prepared to change my mind with images more suited to depicting luster than the typical Heritage overexposure. No opinion, but leaning "favorable." :rolleyes: [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]That coin is a headlight with full blazing and colorful luster.[/COLOR][/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 179)] [/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
I am completely stumped on this MS-67+ Washington Quarter
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...