Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;nm1560, post: 2590699, member: 32396&quot;]The BEP seems to change the rules as they see fit.&nbsp; The colorized $5 2006 is defintely an odd ball. Perhaps plates were already designed and produced. So changing the series designator from H to I was the easiest way to signify the change.&nbsp; </p><p>Now fast forward to the $100 2006 series and yet another rule change.&nbsp;&nbsp; According to the BEP the $100 2006A was given a series change because it signified a new printing batch. Huh?? Same thing with the $100 2009 and $100 2009A. Same signatures different series.&nbsp; I am anxiously awaiting the change, if any, to the $100 2013 which so far have only been printed from Oct 2014-Feb 2015. Which by the way to the &#039;new batch&#039; rule should of changed the $100 2009A series to 2009B because the 2009A series were not printed during this time and reprinting after the 2013 series would be considered a new batch. Rule out the door again.&nbsp; So anyway the $100 2013 has not been printed since Feb 2015.&nbsp; So lets see how these end up.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in