Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rick, post: 113642, member: 1235&quot;]I don&#039;t know speedy... In my opinion, SGS satisfies the definition of fraud by example.&nbsp; While it&#039;s true that grading is subjective, I think there is a clear line between subjective and deceptive.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>When someone intentionally mocks up a grading service to create a perception of trust and legitimacy, when it clearly does not exist in reality, I think that&#039;s fraud.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>As far as law suits and what not, I could not agree with you more - it would probably be throwing good money after bad.&nbsp; But eventually it will happen, and this guy will have to answer for his actions.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>A number of &#039;firms&#039; were taken down in the 80&#039;s for this very same practice of deception in sales - what boils down to selling overstated coins at multiple times their true market value.&nbsp; Point is, you can&#039;t wrong people for a living, and think you are exempt from the possible backlash.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in