How To Judge Fine Style on Ancients?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Aethelred, Jun 8, 2022.

  1. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    All 4 are beautiful in my eyes!
     
    octavius and panzerman like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. panzerman

    panzerman Well-Known Member

    Totally in agreement with Bing...
     
    octavius likes this.
  4. medoraman

    medoraman Well-Known Member

    Excellent examples sir of what I was talking about. The first coin has rudimentary wings, static robes, and a stiff body. The second example has lifelike wings and robes, and fully three dimensional facial features and body. While the first would be labeled acceptable work, the second truly was the work of a master celator.
     
    panzerman, asheland and octavius like this.
  5. SeptimusT

    SeptimusT Well-Known Member

    I think that "I know it when I see it" is as good an answer as anyone can give. Judgements of style are subjective, there's no way around it. Sometimes maybe we can make a judgment about the level of skill that went into making something, but that doesn't always correlate to 'fine style.'

    I think we've all developed an ideal of what ancient art should look like based on other things we've been exposed to, especially Renaissance art; we tend to prefer the ancient works that resemble those over those that don't.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page