Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Herberto, post: 2415412, member: 74222&quot;]@Arnolddoe</p><p><br /></p><p>I do not have David Sear’s reference book on my bookshelf right now. So pardon my clumsy approach right now.</p><p><br /></p><p>…but I am a bit confused:</p><p><br /></p><p>Sear 482 is Constantinople-minted while Sear 529 is Antioch-minted. So how can you say they are Sear 529 AND attributed to Constantinople? You meant they are Sear 529 attributed to ANTIOCH. Right?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>And something else: This is a bit weird as many 22-siliqua attributed as Sear 482 in acseach indeed have “Θ” despite your words. </p><p><br /></p><p>Are you sure that David Sear says 482 does not have the Θ?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in