Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 3380036, member: 15309&quot;]While I agree with your complaint, it bears mentioning that NGC heard our complaints and fixed this a few years ago.&nbsp; Obscured sets can no longer compete for best in category awards.&nbsp; They are still listed in the order that they would be if the set were not obscured, but they aren&#039;t given a numerical ranking in the registry.</p><p><br /></p><p>For example, in the Jefferson Nickel (38-64) category, Specialty One holds the top spot with an obscured set, but Steve Strom is now ranked number one and has won best in category for the last 3 years.&nbsp; Coincidentally, he is one of the PCGS collectors who came over and posted his set on the NGC Registry before the switch and is grandfathered in.&nbsp; The problem is that NGC is much much much more stringent with the application of the full step designation.&nbsp; How many of his first place ranked collection would not be full step designated coins if they were graded by NGC?&nbsp; The only fair way to include PCGS coins is to allow them in the set while assigning them a point value of zero.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in